Robert Lindblad v. Carlos Bolanos, et al
| ROBERT MICHAEL LINDBLAD |
| CARLOS G. BOLANOS, Chief, ANDREW CONSTENTINO, Officer, JIMMY CHUNG, AZAR, Officer, CHEUNG, Officer, COUNTY COMMISSION OF SAN MATEO COUNTY, SAN MATEO COUNTY, JENNIFER ANN STALZER, CHENG, Officer, CITY OF MILLBRAE and SAFEWAY GROCERY OUTLET |
| 22-16200 |
| August 10, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| ROBERT LINDBLAD V. CARLOS BOLANOS, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 18 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Robert Michael Lindblad Correspondence: The district court frivolously removed the appeal to the 9th Circuit Appeals Court based on bad faith argument. The appellant has filed a corresponding letter to the court to validate the appeals standing with a good faith constitutional rights case req.. Date of service: 10/04/2022 [12556153] [22-16200] (Lindblad, Robert) [Entered: 10/04/2022 07:02 PM] |
| Filing 17 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is frivolous and has denied appellant leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12547019] (CKP) [Entered: 09/22/2022 02:25 PM] |
| Filing 16 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 22-16200: Due] ). [12542102] (DJV) [Entered: 09/16/2022 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 15 Received copy of District Court order filed on 09/15/2022 revoking In Forma Pauperis. [12542101] (DJV) [Entered: 09/16/2022 11:06 AM] |
| Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Robert Michael Lindblad Redacted Motion for miscellaneous relief [motion to withdraw the previously submitted excerpts of record]. Date of service: 09/14/2022. [12540488] [22-16200] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect content of filing. 09/15/2022 by TYL] (Lindblad, Robert) [Entered: 09/14/2022 03:41 PM] |
| Filing 13 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Robert Michael Lindblad. Date of service: 09/12/2022. [12538658] [22-16200] (Lindblad, Robert) [Entered: 09/12/2022 05:06 PM] |
| Filing 12 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Robert Michael Lindblad. Date of service: 09/08/2022. [12536038] [22-16200]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect content of filing. 09/15/2022 by JMR] (Lindblad, Robert) [Entered: 09/08/2022 11:38 AM] |
| Filing 11 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Robert Michael Lindblad. Date of service: 09/01/2022. [12532831] [22-16200] (Lindblad, Robert) [Entered: 09/02/2022 03:04 PM] |
| Filing 10 Filed Appellant Mr. Robert Michael Lindblad letter dated 08/25/2022 re: addendum to DE 4. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12529148] (DJV) [Entered: 08/30/2022 07:43 AM] |
| Filing 9 Filed original and 3 copies of Appellant Mr. Robert Michael Lindblad opening brief of 26 pages (Informal: No). Served on 08/25/2022. [12528712] (KT) [Entered: 08/29/2022 02:38 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk:CKP): Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12527357] (CKP) [Entered: 08/26/2022 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed letter dated re: addendum to DE 3. Paper filing deficiency: No certificate of service. [12526179] (DJV) [Entered: 08/25/2022 11:19 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Mr. Robert Michael Lindblad letter dated 08/12/2022 re: addendum to DE 4. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12519031] (DJV) [Entered: 08/17/2022 02:24 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Robert Michael Lindblad Amended Motion to transfer appeal to. Date of service: 08/12/2022. [12516333] [22-16200] (Lindblad, Robert) [Entered: 08/12/2022 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Robert Michael Lindblad Amended Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Date of service: 08/12/2022. [12516331] [22-16200] (Lindblad, Robert) [Entered: 08/12/2022 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Mr. Robert Michael Lindblad motion to change venue. Deficiencies: No certificate of service. Served on. [12516190] (DJV) [Entered: 08/12/2022 02:39 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Mr. Robert Michael Lindblad motion for notication and to extend. Deficiencies: No certificate of service. Served on. [12515142] (DJV) [Entered: 08/11/2022 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Robert Michael Lindblad opening brief due 10/11/2022. Appellees Azar, Carlos G. Bolanos, Cheng, Cheung, Jimmy Chung, City of Millbrae, Andrew Constentino, County Commission of San Mateo County, Safeway Grocery Outlet, San Mateo County and Jennifer Ann Stalzer answering brief due 11/14/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12514353] (RT) [Entered: 08/10/2022 03:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
