Greg Moore, et al v. Sean Garnand, et al
| SOUTHWEST NONPROFIT HOUSING CORPORATION, JC MOORE GRANDCHILDREN'S TRUST and ESMJ PARTNERS |
| REBECCA LOPEZ, Detective, RICHARD RADINSKY, Sergeant, KIMBERLY FRIE, Sergeant, AMY GARNAND, BENJAMIN FRIE, HOLLY RADINSKY and CITY OF TUCSON |
| GREG MOORE and PATRICIA MOORE |
| SEAN GARNAND, Detective and DAIN SALISBURY, Sergeant |
| 22-16236 |
| August 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 GREG MOORE, ET AL V. SEAN GARNAND, ET AL
|
| GREG MOORE, ET AL V. SEAN GARNAND, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including request for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk's Office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12551800] (CL) [Entered: 09/28/2022 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties are directed to address the basis for this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. In particular, the parties should address whether this court has jurisdiction to review the denial of a motion asserting qualified immunity where the district court denied the motion without prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56(d). See Ballou v. McElvain, 29 F.4th 413, 421, 428 (9th Cir. 2022) (noting that the courts jurisdiction is limited to reviewing a denial of qualified immunity and is limited to the question of whether the defendant would be entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law, assuming all factual disputes are resolved, and all reasonable inferences are drawn, in plaintiffs favor). The established briefing schedule remains in effect. [12527689] (WL) [Entered: 08/26/2022 03:34 PM] |
| Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Sarah E. Pace for party(s) Appellant Dain Salisbury Appellant Sean Garnand, in case 22-16236. [12526841] (DJV) [Entered: 08/26/2022 07:14 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Sarah E. Pace (Tucson City Attorney's Office) for Appellants Sean Garnand and Dain Salisbury. Date of service: 08/25/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12526776] [22-16236] (Pace, Sarah) [Entered: 08/25/2022 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED -. The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows : Appellants Sean Garnand and Dain Salisbury opening brief due 11/17/2022. Appellees Greg Moore and Patricia Moore answering brief due 12/19/2022. Appellants optional reply brief is due within twenty one 21 days from the service date of the answer brief. See order for details. [12526541] (VS) [Entered: 08/25/2022 03:00 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 09/28/2022, 2:00 p.m., PACIFIC Time. See order for instructions and details. [12526529] (VS) [Entered: 08/25/2022 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/22/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12523358]. [22-16236] (AD) [Entered: 08/22/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Sean Garnand and Dain Salisbury Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/22/2022. [12523048] [22-16236] (McLaughlin, Dennis) [Entered: 08/22/2022 03:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Sean Garnand and Dain Salisbury Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/22/2022. Appellants Sean Garnand and Dain Salisbury opening brief due 10/17/2022. Appellees Greg Moore and Patricia Moore answering brief due 11/17/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12517436] (RT) [Entered: 08/15/2022 04:31 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
