Michael Floyd v. SJPD, et al
| MICHAEL DEVIN FLOYD |
| SAN JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT, CITY OF SAN JOSE, City Clerk, CITY OF SAN JOSE, OFFICE OF THE CITY ATTORNEY, JOSHUA WHITE, SJPD Officer, DAKOTA PETERS, SJPD Officer, EUGENE ITO, SJPD Sergeant, DAVID MORENO, SJPD Officer and STATE OF CALIFORNIA |
| 22-16243 |
| August 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Attorneys Wesley Martin Klimczak substituted by Attorneys Malgorzata Laskowska [12520872] (JFF) [Entered: 08/19/2022 10:16 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Malgorzata Laskowska (Office of City Attorney, 200 East Santa Clara Street, 16th Floor, San Jose, CA 95113) for Appellees City of San Jose, City of San Jose, Office of the City Attorney, Eugene Ito, David Moreno, Dakota Peters, SJPD and Joshua White. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Wesley Martin Klimczak for Appellees City of San Jose, City of San Jose, Office of the City Attorney, Eugene Ito, David Moreno, Dakota Peters, SJPD and Joshua White. Date of service: 08/19/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12520850] [22-16243] (Laskowska, Malgorzata) [Entered: 08/19/2022 10:09 AM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/18/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12520636]. [22-16243] (AD) [Entered: 08/18/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Michael Devin Floyd Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/18/2022. [12520582] [22-16243] (Floyd, Michael) [Entered: 08/18/2022 05:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 Notice of Appearance (ECF Filing) [2] is rejected. Filer is not permitted to file on behalf of another attorney. Each attorney must file their own notice of appearance. [12520451] (JFF) [Entered: 08/18/2022 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Margo Laskowska, Sr. Deputy City Attorney (Office of the City Attorney, 200 East Santa Clara Street, 16th Floor, San Jose, CA 95113) for Appellees City of San Jose, City of San Jose, Office of the City Attorney, SJPD, Joshua White, Dakota Peters, David Moreno and Eugene Ito. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Wesley Martin Klimczak for Appellees City of San Jose, City of San Jose, Office of the City Attorney, Eugene Ito, David Moreno, Dakota Peters, SJPD and Joshua White. Date of service: 08/18/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12520278] [22-16243] (Laskowska, Malgorzata) [Entered: 08/18/2022 02:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 09/13/2022. Transcript due 10/13/2022. Appellant Michael Devin Floyd opening brief due 11/22/2022. Appellees City of San Jose, City of San Jose, Office of the City Attorney, Eugene Ito, David Moreno, Dakota Peters, San Jose Police Department, State of California and Joshua White answering brief due 12/22/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12518612] (JBS) [Entered: 08/17/2022 10:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
