In re: Dane S. Field, et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
Debtor: In the Matter of: ROLANDO MANGSAT TIRSO and KAMEHALYN SANTOS TIRSO
Plaintiff / Appellant: DANE S. FIELD, Chapter 7 Trustee
Defendant / Appellee: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Case Number: 22-16291
Filed: August 24, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2022 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 09/16/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12532893] (VS) [Entered: 09/02/2022 03:35 PM]
September 1, 2022 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/31/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12531306]. [22-16291] (AD) [Entered: 09/01/2022 06:44 AM]
August 31, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Dane S. Field Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/31/2022. [12531277] [22-16291] (Shima, Van-Alan) [Entered: 08/31/2022 10:33 PM]
August 24, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Dane S. Field Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/31/2022. Appellant Dane S. Field opening brief due 10/24/2022. Appellee Bank of America, N.A. answering brief due 11/25/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12525551] (RT) [Entered: 08/24/2022 02:48 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Dane S. Field, et al v. Bank of America, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor: In the Matter of: ROLANDO MANGSAT TIRSO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Debtor: KAMEHALYN SANTOS TIRSO
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: DANE S. FIELD, Chapter 7 Trustee
Represented By: James J. Bickerton
Represented By: Bridget G. Morgan
Represented By: Van-Alan H. Shima
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: BANK OF AMERICA, N.A.
Represented By: Patricia Jane McHenry Esquire
Represented By: Allison Mizuo Lee Esquire
Represented By: Elizabeth Zwickert Timmermans
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?