Scott Crawford, et al v. Uber Technologies, Inc., et al
| SCOTT CRAWFORD, STEPHAN NAMISNAK and FRANCIS FALLS |
| UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. and RASIER, LLC |
| 22-16292 |
| August 24, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| SCOTT CRAWFORD, ET AL V. UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 22, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 12 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 10/12/2022, 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 09/28/2022). [12546717] (CL) [Entered: 09/22/2022 11:24 AM] |
| Filing 11 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 09/28/2022, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12536442] (BLS) [Entered: 09/08/2022 03:58 PM] |
| Filing 10 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 08/31/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12531244]. [22-16292] (AD) [Entered: 08/31/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 9 Added Attorney(s) Patrick Harvey for party(s) Appellee Uber Technologies, Inc. Appellee Rasier, LLC, in case 22-16292. [12531177] (BJK) [Entered: 08/31/2022 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 8 Notice of Appearance (ECF Filing) [6] is rejected. Filer is not permitted to file on behalf of another attorney. Each attorney must file their own notice of appearance. [12531169] (RL) [Entered: 08/31/2022 04:35 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Patrick Alan Harvey (Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1111 Pennsylvania, Ave. NW Washington, DC 20004) for Appellees Rasier, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.. Date of service: 08/31/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12531124] [22-16292] (Harvey, Patrick) [Entered: 08/31/2022 04:15 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Patrick Alan Harvey (Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004) for Appellees Rasier, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc.. Date of service: 08/31/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12531111] [22-16292] (Schuster, Stephanie) [Entered: 08/31/2022 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) William Most for party(s) Appellant Scott Crawford Appellant Stephan Namisnak Appellant Francis Falls, in case 22-16292. [12530990] (BJK) [Entered: 08/31/2022 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Scott Crawford, Stephan Namisnak and Francis Falls Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 08/31/2022. [12530738] [22-16292] (DeReus, Garret) [Entered: 08/31/2022 01:34 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of William Brock Most (AQUA TERRA AERIS LAW GROUP 4030 Martin Luther King Jr. Way, Oakland, CA 94609) for Appellants Scott Crawford, Francis Falls and Stephan Namisnak. Date of service: 08/31/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12530725] [22-16292] (Most, William) [Entered: 08/31/2022 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12526234] (RL) [Entered: 08/25/2022 11:39 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Scott Crawford, Francis Falls and Stephan Namisnak Mediation Questionnaire due on 08/31/2022. Transcript ordered by 09/22/2022. Transcript due 10/21/2022. Appellants Scott Crawford, Francis Falls and Stephan Namisnak opening brief due 11/30/2022. Appellees Rasier, LLC and Uber Technologies, Inc. answering brief due 12/30/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12525629] (RT) [Entered: 08/24/2022 03:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
