Tommy Keeton v. Jeff Lynch, et al
| TOMMY ROY KEETON |
| JEFF LYNCH, RILEGIL, MOORE, JOANA, DIBBLE, HAMMON, WASH, FLORES, LUCAS, Administrative Law Judge, TENNY, THOMPSON, YANG, MURRAY, AFSHIN ARYA, KNOX, LIUDEQUEST, ZANAVA, MURPHY, COOPER, LANDON and ZURIE |
| 22-16313 |
| August 29, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN and ERIC D. MILLER): Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ]) is denied because appellant has had three or more prior actions or appeals dismissed as frivolous, malicious, or for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted, and appellant has not alleged imminent danger of serious physical injury. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(g); Keeton v. Grannis, No. 03-1724 (E.D. CA March 18, 2004) (dismissal for failure to state a claim); Keeton v. Klarich, et al., No. 05-921 (E.D. CA October 31, 2006) (dismissal for failure to state a claim); Keeton v. Warren, et al., No. 09-564 (E.D. CA September 2, 2009) (dismissal for failure to state a claim). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal and file proof of payment with this court. Failure to pay the fees will result in the automatic dismissal of the appeal by the Clerk for failure to prosecute, regardless of further filings. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. No motions for reconsideration, clarification, or modification of the denial of appellants in forma pauperis status shall be entertained. If the appeal is dismissed for failure to comply with this order, the court will not entertain any motion to reinstate the appeal that is not accompanied by proof of payment of the docketing and filing fees. Briefing is suspended pending further order of this court. [12568242] (AF) [Entered: 10/19/2022 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Tommy Roy Keeton motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/18/2022. [12545984] (DJV) [Entered: 09/21/2022 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 6 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 22-16313: IFP] ). [12545980] (DJV) [Entered: 09/21/2022 02:54 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Tommy Roy Keeton motion for IFP. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/13/2022. [12545976] (DJV) [Entered: 09/21/2022 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received notice of change of address dated 09/18/2022 from Tommy Roy Keeton. New address: E-40265, P.O. Box 29066, Represa, CA 95671. [12545967] (DJV) [Entered: 09/21/2022 02:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Tommy Roy Keeton motion to correct caption and address. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/18/2022. [12545946] --[Edited: Updated Address. 09/21/2022 by TYL] (DJV) [Entered: 09/21/2022 02:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12529866] (CKP) [Entered: 08/30/2022 02:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tommy Roy Keeton opening brief due 10/25/2022.[12528988] (ABT) [Entered: 08/29/2022 04:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
