Richard Rogalinski v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
RICHARD ROGALINSKI, individually and on behalf of the class |
META PLATFORMS, INC. |
22-16327 |
September 1, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
RICHARD ROGALINSKI V. META PLATFORMS, INC. |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 43 Filed (ECF) Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 10/26/2023. [12815888] [22-16327] (Mitchell, Kasdin) [Entered: 10/26/2023 02:29 PM] |
Filing 42 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO EUGENE E. SILER, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and RYAN D. NELSON. The audio and video recordings of this hearing are available on our website at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/ . [12811068] (NAR) [Entered: 10/17/2023 02:37 PM] |
Filing 41 Filed (ECF) Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 10/05/2023. [12805753] [22-16327] (Mitchell, Kasdin) [Entered: 10/05/2023 06:00 PM] |
Filing 40 Filed (ECF) Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 10/03/2023. [12803402] [22-16327] (Mitchell, Kasdin) [Entered: 10/03/2023 01:45 PM] |
Filing 39 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Kasdin Miller Mitchell for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Hearing in San Francisco on 10/17/2023 at 9:00 AM (Courtroom: 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15) Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear in person. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 09/29/2023. [12801332] [22-16327] (Mitchell, Kasdin) [Entered: 09/29/2023 11:00 AM] |
Filing 38 Added Attorney Kasdin Miller Mitchell for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc., in case 22-16327. [12801264] (HH) [Entered: 09/29/2023 10:11 AM] |
Filing 37 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kasdin Miller Mitchell (Kirkland & Ellis LLP, 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, DC 20004) for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Date of service: 09/29/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12801226] [22-16327] (Mitchell, Kasdin) [Entered: 09/29/2023 09:49 AM] |
Filing 36 Filed (ECF) Appellant Richard Rogalinski citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 09/28/2023. [12800532] [22-16327] (Tapp, Andrew) [Entered: 09/28/2023 11:34 AM] |
Filing 35 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Winn Allen for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Hearing in San Francisco on 10/17/2023 at 9:00 AM (Courtroom: 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15) Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear in person. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 09/13/2023. [12791252] [22-16327] (Allen, Winn) [Entered: 09/13/2023 08:47 AM] |
Filing 34 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Andrew Tapp for Appellant Richard Rogalinski. Hearing in San Francisco on 10/17/2023 at 9:00 am (Courtroom: 1). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15) Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear in person. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 09/12/2023. [12790847] [22-16327] (Tapp, Andrew) [Entered: 09/12/2023 02:09 PM] |
Filing 33 Notice of Oral Argument on Tuesday, October 17, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 1 - Scheduled Location: San Francisco CA. The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may have the option to appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. Anyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available # here . At this time, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion. The court expects and supports the fact that some attorneys and some judges will continue to appear remotely. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you do elect to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 28 days before Tuesday, October 17, 2023. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[12768836]. [22-16327] (KS) [Entered: 08/06/2023 06:23 AM] |
Filing 32 Filed (ECF) Attorney Andrew Tapp for Appellant Richard Rogalinski response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 06/22/2023. [12741356] [22-16327] (Tapp, Andrew) [Entered: 06/22/2023 02:54 PM] |
Filing 31 Filed (ECF) Attorney Winn Allen for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 06/22/2023. [12741170] [22-16327] (Allen, Winn) [Entered: 06/22/2023 01:13 PM] |
Filing 30 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in San Francisco Please review the San Francisco sitting dates for October 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation).[12738700]. [22-16327] (KS) [Entered: 06/20/2023 09:41 AM] |
Filing 29 Filed (ECF) Attorney Andrew Tapp for Appellant Richard Rogalinski response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 06/08/2023. [12731951] [22-16327] (Tapp, Andrew) [Entered: 06/08/2023 02:05 PM] |
Filing 28 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Las Vegas. Please review the Las Vegas sitting dates for October 2-6, 2023 at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation). [12729445] (CSR) [Entered: 06/06/2023 09:54 AM] |
Filing 27 Terminated attorney Katherine Epstein for appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. in 22-16327. [12705738] (HH) [Entered: 05/01/2023 09:28 AM] |
Filing 26 Filed (ECF) Notice of withdrawal of counsel. Filed by Attorney Katherine Epstein for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Party proceeding without counsel: No. Date of service: 05/01/2023. [12705650] [22-16327] (Epstein, Katherine) [Entered: 05/01/2023 08:46 AM] |
Filing 25 Received 6 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 23 ] filed by Richard Rogalinski. [12687738] (SD) [Entered: 04/03/2023 01:59 PM] |
Filing 24 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 23 ] submitted by Richard Rogalinski is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12682256] (KT) [Entered: 03/27/2023 10:21 AM] |
Filing 23 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Richard Rogalinski. Date of service: 03/22/2023. [12679579] [22-16327]--[COURT UPDATE: attached corrected PDF of reply brief. 03/27/2023 by KT] (Tapp, Andrew) [Entered: 03/22/2023 01:07 PM] |
Filing 22 Streamlined request [21] by Appellant Richard Rogalinski to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: the optional reply brief is due 03/22/2023. [12651551] (BG) [Entered: 02/13/2023 10:20 AM] |
Filing 21 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellant Richard Rogalinski. New requested due date is 03/22/2023. [12651410] [22-16327] (Tapp, Andrew) [Entered: 02/13/2023 08:59 AM] |
Filing 20 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 18 ] filed by Meta Platforms, Inc.. [12645303] (SD) [Entered: 02/02/2023 04:18 PM] |
Filing 19 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 18 ] submitted by Meta Platforms, Inc. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12642748] (KT) [Entered: 01/31/2023 08:51 AM] |
Filing 18 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Date of service: 01/30/2023. [12642594] [22-16327] (Allen, Winn) [Entered: 01/30/2023 05:26 PM] |
Filing 17 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 11 ] filed by Richard Rogalinski. [12604780] (SD) [Entered: 12/07/2022 03:29 PM] |
Filing 16 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 12 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellant Richard Rogalinski. [12604777] (SD) [Entered: 12/07/2022 03:27 PM] |
Filing 15 Streamlined request [14] by Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. answering brief due 01/30/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12602547] (BG) [Entered: 12/05/2022 03:17 PM] |
Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. New requested due date is 01/30/2023. [12602238] [22-16327] (Epstein, Katherine) [Entered: 12/05/2022 12:34 PM] |
Filing 13 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 11 ] submitted by Richard Rogalinski is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 12 ] submitted by Richard Rogalinski are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12600074] (KT) [Entered: 12/01/2022 11:23 AM] |
Filing 12 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Richard Rogalinski. Date of service: 11/30/2022. [12599465] [22-16327] (Tapp, Andrew) [Entered: 11/30/2022 03:51 PM] |
Filing 11 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Richard Rogalinski. Date of service: 11/30/2022. [12599461] [22-16327] (Tapp, Andrew) [Entered: 11/30/2022 03:49 PM] |
Filing 10 Streamlined request [9] by Appellant Richard Rogalinski to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Richard Rogalinski opening brief due 11/30/2022. Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. answering brief due 12/30/2022. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12572240] (BG) [Entered: 10/25/2022 10:13 AM] |
Filing 9 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Richard Rogalinski. New requested due date is 11/30/2022. [12572126] [22-16327] (Tapp, Andrew) [Entered: 10/25/2022 08:26 AM] |
Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12562520] (VS) [Entered: 10/13/2022 11:59 AM] |
Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 10/13/2022, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12555944] (BLS) [Entered: 10/04/2022 03:23 PM] |
Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/06/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12534468]. [22-16327] (AD) [Entered: 09/06/2022 06:44 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Richard Rogalinski Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/06/2022. [12533968] [22-16327] (Tapp, Andrew) [Entered: 09/06/2022 01:00 PM] |
Filing 4 Added Attorneys Katherine Epstein and Winn Allen for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc., in case 22-16327. [12533862] (HH) [Entered: 09/06/2022 11:41 AM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of K. Winn Allen (KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20004) for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Date of service: 09/06/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12533743] [22-16327] (Allen, Winn) [Entered: 09/06/2022 10:47 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Katherine H. Epstein (KIRKLAND & ELLIS LLP, 1301 Pennsylvania Avenue, N.W., Washington, D.C. 20004) for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Date of service: 09/06/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12533724] [22-16327] (Epstein, Katherine) [Entered: 09/06/2022 10:42 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Richard Rogalinski Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/08/2022. Appellant Richard Rogalinski opening brief due 10/31/2022. Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. answering brief due 11/28/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12531816] (JMR) [Entered: 09/01/2022 01:44 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.