Jose Zavala-Reyes v. Moises Becerra, et al
Petitioner: JOSE MARIA ZAVALA-REYES
Respondent: ACTING DIRECTOR POLLY KAISER, Acting in her Official Capacity, TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting in His Official Capacity, ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Acting in His Official Capacity, MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Acting in His Official Capacity and MOISES BECERRA, Field Office Director for the U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement and Removal Operations San Francisco Field Office
Case Number: 22-16368
Filed: September 12, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (Alien Detainees)
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 13, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 13, 2024 Filing 23 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The stay of proceedings is lifted. Pursuant to the stipulation filed by the parties (Docket Entry No. [ # 22 ]), this appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). This order served on the district court acts as the mandate of this court. . [12859478] (OC) [Entered: 02/13/2024 04:53 PM]
February 8, 2024 Filing 22 Filed (ECF) Appellants Moises Becerra, Merrick B. Garland, Tae D. Johnson and Alejandro N. Mayorkas Joint Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 02/08/2024. [12857904] [22-16368] (Choe, Shiwon) [Entered: 02/08/2024 05:01 PM]
November 28, 2023 Filing 21 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The parties joint motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 20 ]) to stay appellate proceedings is granted. The previously established briefing schedule is vacated. Appellate proceedings are stayed until February 2, 2024. If no motion for further relief is filed before this date, the briefing schedule will be reset in a future order. [12829449] (JBS) [Entered: 11/28/2023 10:18 AM]
November 22, 2023 Filing 20 Filed (ECF) Appellants Moises Becerra, Tae D. Johnson, Alejandro N. Mayorkas and Merrick B. Garland Joint Motion to stay appellate proceedings. Date of service: 11/22/2023. [12827863] [22-16368] (Choe, Shiwon) [Entered: 11/22/2023 11:31 AM]
November 9, 2023 Filing 19 Added Attorney(s) Francisco Miguel Ugarte for party(s) Appellee Jose Maria Zavala-Reyes, in case 22-16368. [12822071] (QDL) [Entered: 11/09/2023 09:43 AM]
November 9, 2023 Filing 18 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Francisco Miguel Ugarte (San Francisco Public Defender's Office, 555 7th Street, San Francisco, CA 94103) for Appellee Jose Maria Zavala-Reyes. Date of service: 11/09/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12822063] [22-16368] (Ugarte, Francisco) [Entered: 11/09/2023 09:39 AM]
October 23, 2023 Filing 17 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The stay of appellate proceedings is lifted. The opening brief is due December 4, 2023. The answering brief is due January 3, 2024. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12813991] (ABT) [Entered: 10/23/2023 02:56 PM]
September 11, 2023 Filing 16 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The parties joint motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 15 ]) to further stay appellate proceedings is granted in part. Appellate proceedings are stayed until issuance of the mandate in Rodriguez Diaz v. Garland, No. 20-16245, or until further order of the court. The parties shall file a status report on or before December 5, 2023, and every 90 days thereafter until issuance of the mandate in Rodriguez Diaz v. Garland. The parties shall notify the court by filing a status report within 7 days after issuance of the mandate in Rodriguez Diaz v. Garland. Failure to file a status report may terminate the stay of appellate proceedings. The briefing schedule will be reset in a future order. [12790221] (JBS) [Entered: 09/11/2023 04:37 PM]
August 24, 2023 Filing 15 Filed (ECF) Appellants Moises Becerra, Merrick B. Garland, Tae D. Johnson and Alejandro N. Mayorkas Joint Motion to stay appellate proceedings. Date of service: 08/24/2023. [12780066] [22-16368] (Choe, Shiwon) [Entered: 08/24/2023 08:25 AM]
July 3, 2023 Filing 14 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): The parties joint motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 13 ]) to further stay appellate proceedings is granted. Appellate proceedings are stayed until September 5, 2023. If no motion for further relief is filed before this date, the briefing schedule will be reset in a future order. [12748041] (WL) [Entered: 07/03/2023 01:24 PM]
May 31, 2023 Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellants Moises Becerra, Merrick B. Garland, Tae D. Johnson and Alejandro N. Mayorkas Joint Motion to stay appellate proceedings. Date of service: 05/31/2023. [12726078] [22-16368] (Choe, Shiwon) [Entered: 05/31/2023 04:44 PM]
March 23, 2023 Filing 12 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LBS): The parties joint motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 11 ]) to further stay appellate proceedings is granted. Appellate proceedings are stayed until June 7, 2023. If no motion for further relief is filed before this date, the briefing schedule will be reset in a future order. [12680498] (JBS) [Entered: 03/23/2023 12:50 PM]
February 27, 2023 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellants Moises Becerra, Merrick B. Garland, Tae D. Johnson and Alejandro N. Mayorkas Joint Motion to stay appellate proceedings. Date of service: 02/27/2023. [12661977] [22-16368] (Choe, Shiwon) [Entered: 02/27/2023 09:52 AM]
January 13, 2023 Filing 10 Appellant Polly Kaiser in 22-16368 substituted by Appellant Moises Becerra in 22-16368 [12629999] (JBS) [Entered: 01/13/2023 09:50 AM]
January 13, 2023 Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LBS): The parties joint motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) to further stay appellate proceedings is granted. Appellate proceedings are stayed until March 9, 2023. If no motion for further relief is filed before this date, the briefing schedule will be reset in a future order. Pursuant to the parties joint motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]), Moises Becerra is substituted for Polly Kaiser as Field Office Director for the U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement and Removal Operations San Francisco Field Office. See Fed. R. App. P. 43(c)(2). [12629995] (JBS) [Entered: 01/13/2023 09:49 AM]
December 19, 2022 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellants Merrick B. Garland, Tae D. Johnson and Alejandro N. Mayorkas Joint Motion to stay appellate proceedings. Date of service: 12/19/2022. [12614322] [22-16368] (Choe, Shiwon) [Entered: 12/19/2022 04:00 PM]
November 21, 2022 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellants Merrick B. Garland, Tae D. Johnson and Alejandro N. Mayorkas Correspondence: Letter errata to correct error in Respondents' Status Report, ECF No. 6. Date of service: 11/21/2022 [12593328] [22-16368] (Choe, Shiwon) [Entered: 11/21/2022 05:17 PM]
November 21, 2022 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellants Merrick B. Garland, Tae D. Johnson and Alejandro N. Mayorkas status report (as required by Court order dated 11/16/2022). Date of service: 11/21/2022 [12593312] [22-16368] (Choe, Shiwon) [Entered: 11/21/2022 05:02 PM]
November 16, 2022 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LBS): Appellants unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) to stay appellate proceedings is granted in part. The previously established briefing schedule is vacated. Appellate proceedings are stayed until resolution of Rodriguez Diaz v. Garland, No. 20-16245, or until further order of the court. Appellants shall file a status report on February 3, 2023, and every 90 days thereafter while resolution of Rodriguez Diaz v. Garland is pending. Appellant shall notify the court by filing a status report within 7 days of the resolution of Rodriguez Diaz v. Garland. Failure to file a status report may terminate the stay of appellate proceedings. The briefing schedule will be reset in a future order. [12589054] (WL) [Entered: 11/16/2022 02:31 PM]
November 8, 2022 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Merrick B. Garland, Tae D. Johnson, Polly Kaiser and Alejandro N. Mayorkas Unopposed Motion to stay appellate proceedings. Date of service: 11/08/2022. [12582578] [22-16368] (Kurlan, Elizabeth) [Entered: 11/08/2022 11:00 AM]
November 2, 2022 Filing 3 Streamlined request [2] by Appellants Merrick B. Garland, Tae D. Johnson, Polly Kaiser and Alejandro N. Mayorkas to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Tae D. Johnson, Polly Kaiser and Alejandro N. Mayorkas opening brief due 12/08/2022. Appellee Jose Maria Zavala-Reyes answering brief due 01/09/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12578439] (JN) [Entered: 11/02/2022 07:56 AM]
November 1, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Merrick B. Garland, Tae D. Johnson, Polly Kaiser and Alejandro N. Mayorkas. New requested due date is 12/08/2022. [12578396] [22-16368] (Kurlan, Elizabeth) [Entered: 11/01/2022 09:38 PM]
September 12, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Merrick B. Garland, Attorney General, Tae D. Johnson, Polly Kaiser and Alejandro N. Mayorkas opening brief due 11/08/2022. Appellee Jose Maria Zavala-Reyes answering brief due 12/08/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12537957] (JBS) [Entered: 09/12/2022 10:58 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jose Zavala-Reyes v. Moises Becerra, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSE MARIA ZAVALA-REYES
Represented By: Francisco Miguel Ugarte
Represented By: Genna Ellis Beier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ACTING DIRECTOR POLLY KAISER, Acting in her Official Capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: TAE D. JOHNSON, Acting in His Official Capacity
Represented By: Elizabeth D. Kurlan
Represented By: Shiwon Choe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: ALEJANDRO N. MAYORKAS, Acting in His Official Capacity
Represented By: Elizabeth D. Kurlan
Represented By: Shiwon Choe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, Acting in His Official Capacity
Represented By: Elizabeth D. Kurlan
Represented By: Shiwon Choe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MOISES BECERRA, Field Office Director for the U.S. Immigration Customs Enforcement and Removal Operations San Francisco Field Office
Represented By: Elizabeth D. Kurlan
Represented By: Shiwon Choe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?