Pulido Hernandez, et al. v. Garland
Petitioner: JOSE PULIDO HERNANDEZ and IRMA HERNANDEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-1638
Filed: October 4, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 15, 2024 PULIDO HERNANDEZ, ET AL. V. GARLAND

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 5, 2023 Filing 35 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for February 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [22-1638] [Entered: 10/05/2023 09:23 AM]
August 16, 2023 Filing 34 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for December 2023 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [22-1638] [Entered: 08/16/2023 10:06 AM]
June 23, 2023 Filing 33 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 31 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 06/23/2023 12:16 PM]
June 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 31 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 06/15/2023 02:16 PM]
June 14, 2023 Filing 31 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/14/2023 03:13 PM]
May 3, 2023 Filing 30 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Joanna L. Watson for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/03/2023 12:05 PM]
May 3, 2023 Filing 29 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Joanna L. Watson for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/03/2023 11:52 AM]
April 21, 2023 Filing 28 Paper copies (7) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 26 by Petitioners Jose Pulido Hernandez and Irma Hernandez received. [Entered: 04/21/2023 02:36 PM]
April 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 26 by Petitioners Jose Pulido Hernandez and Irma Hernandez is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioners must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 04/17/2023 03:27 PM]
April 17, 2023 Filing 26 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Jose Pulido Hernandez, Petitioner Irma Hernandez. [Entered: 04/17/2023 11:33 AM]
March 15, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER FILED. Petitioner's motion (Docket Entry No. 24) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due April 17, 2023. The answering brief is due June 16, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 03/15/2023 09:46 AM]
March 13, 2023 Filing 24 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Jose Pulido Hernandez, Petitioner Irma Hernandez. [Entered: 03/13/2023 05:03 PM]
February 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry Nos. 21, 22) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is now due March 13, 2023. The answering brief is due May 12, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 02/22/2023 09:59 AM]
February 10, 2023 Filing 22 SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Extend Time to File Opening Brief (DE 21) filed by Petitioner Jose Pulido Hernandez, Petitioner Irma Hernandez. [Entered: 02/10/2023 01:19 PM]
February 8, 2023 Filing 21 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Jose Pulido Hernandez, Petitioner Irma Hernandez. [Entered: 02/08/2023 06:02 PM]
January 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 19) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/8/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 4/10/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 01/10/2023 10:11 AM]
January 9, 2023 Filing 19 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Jose Pulido Hernandez, Petitioner Irma Hernandez. [Entered: 01/09/2023 11:14 AM]
November 29, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 11/29/2022 04:21 PM]
November 29, 2022 Filing 17 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/29/2022 12:11 PM]
October 24, 2022 Filing 16 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 10/24/2022 08:57 AM]
October 13, 2022 Filing 15 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Anthony Cardozo Payne, Counsel for Respondent Jennifer A. Bowen representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/13/2022 02:45 PM]
October 13, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FILED. Respondents motions (Docket Entry Nos. 12, 13) to withdraw the appearances of Anthony Cardozo Payne and Jennifer A. Bowen are granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect that Anthony Cardozo Payne and Jennifer A. Bowen are no longer counsel of record for respondent. The certified administrative record remains due November 8, 2022. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due November 29, 2022. The opening brief is due January 9, 2023. The answering brief is due March 8, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 10/13/2022 02:43 PM]
October 5, 2022 Filing 13 MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Jennifer A. Bowen for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/05/2022 08:58:00 AM]
October 5, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Anthony Cardozo Payne for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/05/2022 08:48:00 AM]
October 4, 2022 Filing 11 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Kristen H. Blosser for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/04/2022 03:00:00 PM]
October 4, 2022 Filing 10 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Kristen H. Blosser for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/04/2022 02:46:00 PM]
October 4, 2022 Filing 9 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Jennifer A. Bowen for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/04/2022 02:02:00 PM]
October 4, 2022 Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Anthony Cardozo Payne for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/04/2022 02:00:00 PM]
October 4, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jennifer A. Bowen for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/04/2022 11:13:00 AM]
October 4, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anthony Cardozo Payne for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/04/2022 10:41:00 AM]
October 4, 2022 Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 11/8/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 11/29/2022, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/9/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 3/8/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/04/2022 10:01:00 AM]
October 4, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 10/04/2022 09:57:00 AM]
October 4, 2022 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/3/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1638 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/04/2022 09:53:00 AM]
October 3, 2022 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 9/7/2022. [Entered: 10/03/2022 05:56:00 PM]
October 3, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/03/2022 05:56:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Pulido Hernandez, et al. v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: JOSE PULIDO HERNANDEZ
Represented By: Mr. Marc Karlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: IRMA HERNANDEZ
Represented By: Mr. Marc Karlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Joanna L. Watson
Represented By: Ms. Kristen H. Blosser
Represented By: Mr. Anthony Cardozo Payne
Represented By: Oil
Represented By: Jennifer A. Bowen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?