William Vera v. Warden, et al
| WILLIAM VERA, AKA Memo Vera and GUILLERMO VERA, AKA Memo Vera, AKA William Vera |
| WARDEN, KIMBERLY BOYD BOWMAN, PICASSO, PHILLIPS, C.O, VALLE, C.O, TAMI LEFFLER, Social worker and R LUNA |
| 22-16382 |
| September 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Guillermo Vera letter dated 11/02/2022 re: extension of time. Paper filing deficiency: Mandate Issued. [12583017] (NAC) [Entered: 11/08/2022 03:49 PM] |
| Filing 4 Streamlined request by Appellant Guillermo Vera to extend time to file the brief is not approved because the case is closed. [12575858] (JN) [Entered: 10/28/2022 03:14 PM] |
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (MDS, DAB and LVD) [12563128] (NAC) [Entered: 10/14/2022 07:50 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (MILAN D. SMITH, JR., DANIEL A. BRESS and LAWRENCE VANDYKE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the magistrate judge order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12546991] (JMR) [Entered: 09/22/2022 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant William Vera opening brief due 11/14/2022. [12539903] (ABT) [Entered: 09/14/2022 10:10 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
