Shawn Goff v. Trinity Services Group, et al
| SHAWN CHARLES GOFF |
| TRINITY SERVICES GROUP, KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK, LLC, DAVID SHINN, Director, AMBER PUCKETT and WILLIAM R. THOMAS |
| 22-16391 |
| September 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 20, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, SANDRA S. IKUTA and ERIC D. MILLER) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the magistrate judge order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable); see also Rosenfeld v. United States, 859 F.2d 717, 721-22 (9th Cir. 1988) (grant or denial of interim attorneys fees against a party is generally not an appealable final order under 28 U.S.C. 1291). DISMISSED. [12568966] (WL) [Entered: 10/20/2022 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 Terminated Bradley Dunn for Trinity Services Group, David Shinn and Keefe Commissary Network, LLC in 22-16391 for lack of electronic filing registration. [12540611] (JMR) [Entered: 09/14/2022 04:43 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Shawn Charles Goff opening brief due 11/14/2022. Appellees Keefe Commissary Network, LLC, Amber Puckett, David Shinn, Director, William R. Thomas and Trinity Services Group answering brief due 12/13/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12540604] (JMR) [Entered: 09/14/2022 04:40 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
