Alfred Caraffa v. Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, et al
ALFRED E. CARAFFA |
MARICOPA COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, named as MCSO, C GARCIA, Deputy, UNKNOWN PARTY, named as ILS Deputy B1300 and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, named as United States |
22-16410 |
September 16, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Prison Condition |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 Filed Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa motion to combine jurisdiction. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/20/2022. [12585649] (DJV) [Entered: 11/14/2022 07:50 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa motion for new evidence. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/12/2022. [12557523] (DJV) [Entered: 10/06/2022 01:38 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa motion for default judgment. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/12/2022. [12557514] (DJV) [Entered: 10/06/2022 01:36 PM] |
Filing 4 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet in response to the request filed on 10-03-2022. [12554975] [22-16388, 22-16410] (JR) [Entered: 10/03/2022 03:45 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa motion for transfer to correct jurisdiction. Deficiencies: None. Served on 09/21/2022. [12554791] (DJV) [Entered: 10/03/2022 02:45 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa letter dated 09/21/2022 re: request for docket sheet /case file. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12554781] (DJV) [Entered: 10/03/2022 02:41 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Alfred E. Caraffa opening brief due 11/14/2022. [12542099] (ABT) [Entered: 09/16/2022 11:05 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.