David Suski, et al v. Coinbase, Inc., et al
| MARDEN-KANE, INC. and COINBASE GLOBAL, INC. |
| DAVID SUSKI, JAIMEE MARTIN, JONAS CALSBEEK and THOMAS MAHER, Individually and On Behalf of All Others |
| COINBASE, INC. |
| 22-16506 |
| October 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Contract Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 11 MEDIATION ORDER FILED - The briefing schedule previously set by the court is amended as follows: Appellant Coinbase, Inc. opening brief due 01/05/2023. Appellees Jonas Calsbeek, Thomas Maher, Jaimee Martin and David Suski answering brief due 02/06/2023. Appellant optional reply brief is due within twenty one 21 days from the service date of the answering brief. See order for details. [12598181] (CL) [Entered: 11/29/2022 02:08 PM] |
| Filing 10 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 12/12/2022, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 12/01/2022). [12595732] (CL) [Entered: 11/25/2022 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 9 Added Attorney(s) Bethany Christa Lobo for party(s) Appellant Coinbase, Inc., in case 22-16506. [12595108] (DJV) [Entered: 11/23/2022 01:14 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Bethany C. Lobo (Cooley LLP, 3 Embarcadero Center, 20th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94111) for Appellant Coinbase, Inc.. Date of service: 11/23/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12595091] [22-16506] (Lobo, Bethany) [Entered: 11/23/2022 01:05 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 12/01/2022, 11:30 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12592097] [22-16506, 22-16508] (CL) [Entered: 11/21/2022 08:28 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AF): The parties Joint Motion to Consolidate Appeals is DENIED. [12577819] [22-15209, 22-16506] (AF) [Entered: 11/01/2022 12:00 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Coinbase, Inc. Joint Motion to consolidate cases 22-15209, 22-16506. Date of service: 10/25/2022. [12572867] [22-16506] (Hartnett, Kathleen) [Entered: 10/25/2022 05:06 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/11/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12560756]. [22-16506] (AD) [Entered: 10/12/2022 06:44 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Coinbase, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/11/2022. [12560707] [22-16506] (Hartnett, Kathleen) [Entered: 10/11/2022 08:25 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Coinbase, Inc. Correspondence: Letter to Clerk. Date of service: 10/04/2022 [12556125] [22-16506] (Hartnett, Kathleen) [Entered: 10/04/2022 05:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Coinbase, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/11/2022. Appellant Coinbase, Inc. opening brief due 12/05/2022. Appellees Jonas Calsbeek, Thomas Maher, Jaimee Martin and David Suski answering brief due 01/05/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12554370] (RT) [Entered: 10/03/2022 11:22 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
