Tahee Tasheed v. State of California, et al
TAHEE ABDULLAH TASHEED |
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, REDWOOD CITY, California, CARL HOLM, Judge, HANEY, District Attorney and D. WACHOLBORN |
22-16523 |
October 4, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, SSI and EDM) [12585865] (HH) [Entered: 11/14/2022 09:44 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, SANDRA S. IKUTA and ERIC D. MILLER) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12570130] (WL) [Entered: 10/21/2022 11:58 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tahee Abdullah Tasheed opening brief due 12/07/2022. Appellees Haney, Carl Holm, Redwood City, State of California and D. Wacholborn answering brief due 01/09/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12555887] (RT) [Entered: 10/04/2022 02:56 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.