Howard Hofelich, et al v. State of Hawaii, et al
| HOWARD ROBERT HOFELICH |
| SOUTH PACIFIC SCUBA TOURS, INC. |
| STATE OF HAWAII, DCCA, DLNR, DENNIS KRUEGER, Esq., ASHFORD AND WRISTON LAW CORPORATION, DAVID B. KAAPU, Esq., STEPHEN D. WHITTAKER, Esq., CARL VINCENTI, JUNG & VASSAR LAW CORPORATION, RONALD IBARRA, Administrative Law Judge, UNITED STATES COAST GUARD VESSEL DOCUMENTATION CENTER, DAVID HARRISON LAWTON, Esq., DOE CORPORATIONS, 1-10, JOHN DOES, 1-10, JANE DOES, 1-10, GOVERNMENTAL ENTITIES, 1-10 and DOE PARTNERSHIPS, 1-10; Doe LLC Corporations, 1-10 |
| 22-16525 |
| October 4, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 26, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: TSP) Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this appeal is dismissed for failure to respond to order. (Order dated 12/01/2022), This order served on the district court shall, 21 days after the date of the order, act as the mandate of this court. [12639730] (TSP) [Entered: 01/26/2023 01:58 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LAB): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward.[12600167] (WL) [Entered: 12/01/2022 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellees Jung & Vassar Law Corporation and David Harrison Lawton response opposing motion ([ # 3 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 10/25/2022. [12572903] [22-16525] (Lawton, David) [Entered: 10/25/2022 07:17 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Mr. Howard Robert Hofelich motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 10/13/2022. [12572826] (HH) [Entered: 10/25/2022 04:37 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12556732] (CKP) [Entered: 10/05/2022 02:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Howard Robert Hofelich opening brief due 12/07/2022. Appellees Ashford and Wriston Law Corporation, DLNR, Doe Corporations, Doe Partnerships, Governmental Entities, Ronald Ibarra, Administrative Law Judge, Jane Does, John Does, Jung & Vassar Law Corporation, David B. Kaapu, Dennis Krueger, David Harrison Lawton, State of Hawaii, United States Coast Guard Vessel Documentation Center, Carl Vincenti and Stephen D. Whittaker answering brief due 01/09/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12556038] (RT) [Entered: 10/04/2022 04:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
