Buren Burgess v. David Shinn, et al
| BUREN JARRETT BURGESS |
| DAVID SHINN, Director, Arizona Department of Corrections and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General, State of Arizona |
| 22-16550 |
| October 7, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: NZ): Appellants motion for an extension of time to file a request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) is granted. Any request for a certificate of appealability is due by December 16, 2022. [12590100] (OC) [Entered: 11/17/2022 12:50 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Buren Jarrett Burgess motion to extend time to file COA request for 30 days. Deficiencies: None. Served on 11/10/2022. [12589073] (BJK) [Entered: 11/16/2022 02:37 PM] |
| Filing 3 Terminated Michael Philip Denea for Buren Jarrett Burgess. [12572139] (RL) [Entered: 10/25/2022 08:47 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Notice of withdrawal of counsel. Filed by Attorney Mr. Michael Philip Denea, Esquire for Appellant Buren Jarrett Burgess. Party proceeding without counsel: Yes, mailing address provided. Party mailing address: APSC - Central Arizona Correctional Facility | Buren Burgess ADCRR # 133841 | Phoenix, Arizona 85132. Date of service: 10/24/2022. [12572038] [22-16550] (Denea, Michael) [Entered: 10/24/2022 08:19 PM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 09/21/2022. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12558733] (JBS) [Entered: 10/07/2022 02:51 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
