Lupita Barbosa, et al v. Shasta County, et al
| LUPITA BARBOSA, K. B., T. B., ANGELICA MARTINEZ-VERA, KATHLEEN HOOD and THOMAS BARBOSA, Deceased |
| SHASTA COUNTY, ERIC MAGRINI, Shasta County Sheriff-Coroner, JOSE GONZALEZ, Sergeant and THOMAS FLEMING, Deputy |
| 22-16583 |
| October 14, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 10 MEDIATION STATUS REPORT DUE - 01/03/2023. See order for details. [12589947] (CL) [Entered: 11/17/2022 11:43 AM] |
| Filing 9 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 11/17/2022, 10:00 a.m. Pacific Time. (Time change only). [12585310] (CL) [Entered: 11/10/2022 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 8 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 11/17/2022, 2:00 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12571883] (CL) [Entered: 10/24/2022 04:12 PM] |
| Filing 7 Added Attorneys Lynn Carpenter, Mildred Katherine O'Linn for party Appellant Thomas Fleming, in case 22-16583. [12568255] (JMR) [Entered: 10/19/2022 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 6 Terminated Teresa Allen for Thomas Fleming in 22-16583, Michael Joseph Haddad for Thomas Fleming in 22-16583, Brian Hawkinson for Thomas Fleming in 22-16583, Julia Sherwin for Thomas Fleming in 22-16583 [12568250] (JMR) [Entered: 10/19/2022 04:39 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/18/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12566954]. [22-16583] (AD) [Entered: 10/18/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Thomas Fleming, Jose Gonzalez, Eric Magrini and Shasta County Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/18/2022. [12566525] [22-16583]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDF 10/18/2022 by NAC] (Davenport, Scott) [Entered: 10/18/2022 02:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Scott Wm. Davenport for party(s) Appellant Thomas Fleming Appellant Jose Gonzalez Appellant Eric Magrini Appellant Shasta County, in case 22-16583. [12566462] (NAC) [Entered: 10/18/2022 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Scott Wm. Davenport (Manning & Kass, Ellrod, Ramirez Trester, 801 S. Figueroa, 15th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90017) for Appellants Thomas Fleming, Jose Gonzalez, Eric Magrini and Shasta County. Date of service: 10/18/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12566458] [22-16583] (Davenport, Scott) [Entered: 10/18/2022 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Thomas Fleming, Jose Gonzalez, Eric Magrini and Shasta County Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/21/2022. Transcript ordered by 11/14/2022. Transcript due 12/12/2022. Appellants Thomas Fleming, Jose Gonzalez, Eric Magrini and Shasta County opening brief due 01/20/2023. Appellees K. B., T. B., Lupita Barbosa, Thomas Barbosa, Kathleen Hood and Angelica Martinez-Vera answering brief due 02/21/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12563760] (RT) [Entered: 10/14/2022 01:52 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
