Kentrell Welch v. Michael Minev, et al
| JAMES DZURENDA |
| KENTRELL D. WELCH |
| MICHAEL MINEV, NDOC Medical Dir, TITO BUENCAMINO, NDOC Dir of Nursing, G. BRYANT, contracted general practitioner M.D., JENNIFER NASH, Associate Warden, BRIAN WILLIAMS, Warden, GALLO and PATERNOSTER |
| 22-16591 |
| October 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| KENTRELL WELCH V. MICHAEL MINEV, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA and RICHARD R. CLIFTON) : A review of the district court docket reflects that the district court granted appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis and that such permission has not been revoked. Accordingly, appellants in forma pauperis status continues in this court. See Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3). Appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal (Docket Entry No. 3) is therefore unnecessary. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(1) and (2), however, appellant eventually must pay the full amount of the filing and docketing fees for this appeal. Accordingly, within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall complete and file with this court the enclosed prisoner authorization form, which directs the prison officials at appellants institution to assess, collect, and forward to the court the $505.00 filing and docketing fees for this appeal on a monthly basis whenever funds exist in appellants trust fund account. These fees will continue to be collected regardless of the date or manner of disposition of this appeal. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(b)(2), (e)(2). If appellant fails to comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The court, in its discretion, denies the motion for appointment of pro bono counsel (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ] ). Appellants interlocutory appeal request (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ] ) is denied. The opening brief has been filed. The answering brief is due January 9, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel and did not file excerpts of record, appellees must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. The Clerk will serve this order and a prisoner authorization form on appellant. [12609771] (RT) [Entered: 12/13/2022 04:38 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Kentrell D. Welch motion for interlocutory appeal request. Deficiencies: None. [12591202] (NAC) [Entered: 11/18/2022 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Kentrell D. Welch motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12581966] (NAC) [Entered: 11/07/2022 03:10 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Kentrell D. Welch motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12581961] (NAC) [Entered: 11/07/2022 03:09 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Kentrell D. Welch opening brief of 9 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 10/26/2022. [12581795] (KT) [Entered: 11/07/2022 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kentrell D. Welch opening brief due 12/16/2022. Appellees G. Bryant, Tito Buencamino, Gallo, Michael Minev, Jennifer Nash, Paternoster and Brian Williams, Warden answering brief due 01/17/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12565440] (WL) [Entered: 10/17/2022 03:22 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
