Kevin Collins v. County of Alameda, et al
| KEVIN COLLINS |
| COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, CITY OF OAKLAND, ANNE KIRKPATRICK, Oakland Chief of Police in her Individual Capacity, JOEL HIGHT, A. GATDULA, Oakland Police Officer in his Individual Capacity, ROBERTO RUIZ, Jr., Oakland Police Officer in his Individual Capacity and MELISSA DOOHER |
| 22-16604 |
| October 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: SMC): Appellants motion to dismiss this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]) is granted. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The parties shall bear their own costs and attorneys fees on appeal. A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [12604648] (AF) [Entered: 12/07/2022 02:18 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kevin Collins Motion to dismiss case voluntarily pursuant to FRAP 42(b). Date of service: 12/06/2022. [12603244] [22-16604] (Bonner, Charles) [Entered: 12/06/2022 10:49 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (A district court order is . . . not appealable [under 1291] unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981))). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court. [12590468] (AF) [Entered: 11/17/2022 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference, 12/06/2022, 11:00 a.m. Pacific Time. See order for details. [12588404] (CL) [Entered: 11/16/2022 08:42 AM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 11/15/2022, 1:30 p.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12574946] (CL) [Entered: 10/27/2022 04:24 PM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/25/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12572896]. [22-16604] (AD) [Entered: 10/25/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kevin Collins Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/25/2022. [12572784] [22-16604] (Bonner, Charles) [Entered: 10/25/2022 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kevin Collins Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/25/2022. Transcript ordered by 11/16/2022. Transcript due 12/16/2022. Appellant Kevin Collins opening brief due 01/25/2023. Appellees City of Oakland, County of Alameda, Melissa Dooher, A. Gatdula, Joel Hight, Anne Kirkpatrick and Roberto Ruiz Jr. answering brief due 02/24/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12566631] (OC) [Entered: 10/18/2022 02:57 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
