Prutehi Litekyan: Save Ritidian v. United States Department of the Air Force, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: PRUTEHI LITEKYAN: SAVE RITIDIAN
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE, FRANK KENDALL, Secretary of the Air Force, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE and LLOYD AUSTIN, Secretary of Defense
Case Number: 22-16613
Filed: October 19, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Environmental Matters

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 13, 2025 Summary LITEKYAN V. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 1, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 1, 2022 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12600398] (VS) [Entered: 12/01/2022 03:28 PM]
November 1, 2022 Filing 6 Added Attorney(s) Robert Parke Stockman for party(s) Appellee Lloyd Austin Appellee Frank Kendall Appellee United States Department of the Air Force, in case 22-16613. [12577956] (DJV) [Entered: 11/01/2022 01:32 PM]
November 1, 2022 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Robert Parke Stockman (U.S. Department of Justice, Environment & Natural Resources Division, PO Box 7415, Washington, DC 20044) for Appellees Lloyd Austin, DOD, Frank Kendall and United States Department of the Air Force. Date of service: 11/01/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12577940] [22-16613] (Stockman, Robert) [Entered: 11/01/2022 01:17 PM]
October 27, 2022 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 11/14/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12574065] (VS) [Entered: 10/27/2022 09:34 AM]
October 24, 2022 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/24/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12571394]. [22-16613] (AD) [Entered: 10/24/2022 12:44 PM]
October 24, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Prutehi Litekyan: Save Ritidian Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/24/2022. [12571388] [22-16613] (Chau, Thien) [Entered: 10/24/2022 12:41 PM]
October 19, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Prutehi Litekyan: Save Ritidian Mediation Questionnaire due on 10/26/2022. Transcript ordered by 11/17/2022. Transcript due 12/19/2022. Appellant Prutehi Litekyan: Save Ritidian opening brief due 01/26/2023. Appellees Lloyd Austin, Frank Kendall, United States Department of Defense and United States Department of the Air Force answering brief due 02/27/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12567777] (JBS) [Entered: 10/19/2022 02:10 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Prutehi Litekyan: Save Ritidian v. United States Department of the Air Force, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PRUTEHI LITEKYAN: SAVE RITIDIAN
Represented By: Thien Tam Chau Esquire
Represented By: David L. Henkin Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
Represented By: Mikel William Schwab Esquire
Represented By: Jessica Friday Wessling Esquire
Represented By: Robert Parke Stockman Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: FRANK KENDALL, Secretary of the Air Force
Represented By: Mikel William Schwab Esquire
Represented By: Jessica Friday Wessling Esquire
Represented By: Robert Parke Stockman Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
Represented By: Mikel William Schwab Esquire
Represented By: Jessica Friday Wessling Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: LLOYD AUSTIN, Secretary of Defense
Represented By: Mikel William Schwab Esquire
Represented By: Jessica Friday Wessling Esquire
Represented By: Robert Parke Stockman Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?