Vinod Sharma, et al v. HSI Asset Loan Obligation Trust 2007-1, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: VINOD SHARMA and VIJAY L. SHARMA
Defendant / Appellee: HSI ASSET LOAN OBLIGATION TRUST 2007-1 and HSI ASSET SECURITIZATION CORPORATION
Case Number: 22-16614
Filed: October 19, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Foreclosure
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 15, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 15, 2022 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): The courts records reflect that appellant filed a timely motion listed in Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4(a)(4), and that motion is still pending in the district court. The October 17, 2022 notice of appeal is therefore ineffective until entry of the order disposing of the last such motion outstanding. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(4). Accordingly, proceedings in this court are held in abeyance pending the district courts resolution of the pending October 5, 2022 motion. See Leader Natl Ins. Co. v. Indus. Indem. Ins. Co., 19 F.3d 444, 445 (9th Cir. 1994); Tripati v. Henman, 845 F.2d 205, 206 (9th Cir. 1988). Within 14 days after the district courts ruling on the pending motion, appellants must file a written notice in this court: (1) informing this court of the district courts ruling; and (2) stating whether appellants intend to prosecute this appeal. To appeal the district courts ruling on the post-judgment motion, appellants must file an amended notice of appeal within the time prescribed by Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 4. The Clerk will serve this order on the district court. [12611576] (CKP) [Entered: 12/15/2022 12:21 PM]
November 10, 2022 Filing 4 Filed order MEDIATION (RGA): This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including requests for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerks office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions. [12585120] (JMR) [Entered: 11/10/2022 02:46 PM]
November 2, 2022 Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 11/01/2022. [12578485] (RT) [Entered: 11/02/2022 09:12 AM]
October 26, 2022 Filing 2 Filed order MEDIATION (VS): The Mediation Program of the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See Fed. R. App. P. 33 and Ninth Cir. R. 33-1. As part of a pilot project, the Mediation Program is exploring settlement potential in some cases in which one party is proceeding pro se (representing themselves without the assistance of an attorney). This case is being included in the pilot project. The court has scheduled a dial-in telephone assessment conference at the date and time indicated above to explore settlement potential. Participants with an email address on the attached list will receive an email with dial-in information. If an email address is not listed or if there are any changes or additions to the list, please notify the Mediation Office at mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov. Participants may also leave a message at (415) 355-7900 to request dial-in information. Finally, please notify Circuit Mediator Roxane Ashe immediately by email (Roxane_Ashe@ca9.uscourts.gov) if a participant has an unavoidable scheduling conflict. Please copy all participants on any such communications. All emails should include the Ninth Circuit case name and number in the subject line. All written or spoken communication with the mediator, including the discussions during the scheduled conference, are strictly confidential mediation communications protected by Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1 and cannot be disclosed outside the mediation process. Additional information about confidentiality (including a copy of Ninth Circuit Rule 33-1), the assessment conference, and the Mediation Program are attached and can also be found at the Mediation Program website (www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation). The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [12573449] (JBS) [Entered: 10/26/2022 01:44 PM]
October 19, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANTS. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 11/16/2022. Transcript due 12/16/2022. Appellants Vijay L. Sharma and Vinod Sharma opening brief due 01/25/2023. Appellees HSI Asset Loan Obligation Trust 2007-1 and HSI Asset Securitization Corporation answering brief due 02/24/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12567848] (WL) [Entered: 10/19/2022 02:34 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Vinod Sharma, et al v. HSI Asset Loan Obligation Trust 2007-1, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: VINOD SHARMA
Represented By: Vinod Sharma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: VIJAY L. SHARMA
Represented By: Vijay L. Sharma
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HSI ASSET LOAN OBLIGATION TRUST 2007-1
Represented By: Mark Gerard Rackers Esquire
Represented By: Anna Jane Irene Zarndt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: HSI ASSET SECURITIZATION CORPORATION
Represented By: Mark Gerard Rackers Esquire
Represented By: Anna Jane Irene Zarndt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?