Gary Welchen v. Rob Bonta, et al
| SCOTT R. JONES, in his official capacity as the Sacramento County Sheriff |
| GARY WAYNE WELCHEN |
| ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California |
| 22-16649 |
| October 25, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 01/11/2023, 09:00 a.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 11/28/2022 ). [12613909] (VS) [Entered: 12/19/2022 01:15 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 11/28/2022, 12:00 p.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 12/02/2022 ). [12587798] (VS) [Entered: 11/15/2022 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 12/02/2022, 11:30 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12587374] (VS) [Entered: 11/15/2022 09:42 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 10/28/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12576082]. [22-16649] (AD) [Entered: 10/28/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Rob Bonta Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 10/28/2022. [12575575] [22-16649] (Zelidon-Zepeda, Jose) [Entered: 10/28/2022 12:59 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Rob Bonta Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/01/2022. Transcript ordered by 11/21/2022. Transcript due 12/20/2022. Appellant Rob Bonta opening brief due 01/30/2023. Appellee Gary Wayne Welchen answering brief due 03/01/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12572777] (JBS) [Entered: 10/25/2022 04:06 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Gary Welchen v. Rob Bonta, et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellee: GARY WAYNE WELCHEN | |
| Represented By: | Phil Telfeyan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellant: ROB BONTA, in his official capacity as the Attorney General of California | |
| Represented By: | Jose Zelidon-Zepeda |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: SCOTT R. JONES, in his official capacity as the Sacramento County Sheriff | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
