Brian Whitaker v. Peet's Coffee, Inc.
| BRIAN WHITAKER |
| PEET'S COFFEE, INC., a Virginia Corporation |
| 22-16676 |
| October 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is NOT SELECTED for inclusion in the Mediation Program. [12599444] (VS) [Entered: 11/30/2022 03:44 PM] |
| Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/19/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12592000]. [22-16676] (AD) [Entered: 11/19/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Brian Whitaker Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/19/2022. [12591999] [22-16676]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDF of mediation questionnaire. 11/21/2022 by QDL] (Handy, Russell) [Entered: 11/19/2022 05:24 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12586551] (BLS) [Entered: 11/14/2022 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 3 Attorney Dennis J. Price II substituted by Attorney Russell Clive Handy in 22-16676. [12574971] (HH) [Entered: 10/27/2022 04:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Russell Clive Handy (Potter Handy LLP 100 Pine St., Suite 1250, San Francisco, California 94111) for Appellant Brian Whitaker. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Dennis J. Price, II, Esquire for Appellant Brian Whitaker. Date of service: 10/27/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12574949] [22-16676] (Handy, Russell) [Entered: 10/27/2022 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Brian Whitaker Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/03/2022. Appellant Brian Whitaker opening brief due 01/27/2023. Appellee Peet's Coffee, Inc. answering brief due 02/27/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12574873] (JBS) [Entered: 10/27/2022 03:50 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Brian Whitaker v. Peet's Coffee, Inc. | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: BRIAN WHITAKER | |
| Represented By: | Russell Clive Handy Esquire |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: PEET'S COFFEE, INC., a Virginia Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Michael Brett Burns |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
