Stephen Tripodi v. David Fero, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: STEPHEN TRIPODI
Defendant / Appellee: DAVID FERO and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Case Number: 22-16680
Filed: October 28, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Fraud

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 26, 2024 STEPHEN TRIPODI V. DAVID FERO, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 14, 2022 Filing 6 Attorneys Katherine Rae Branch substituted by Attorneys Peter S. Kozinets in 22-16680 [12610186] (BJK) [Entered: 12/14/2022 10:41 AM]
December 14, 2022 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Peter S. Kozinets (U.S. Attorney's Office, 40 N. Central Ave., Suite 1800, Phoenix, AZ 85004) for Appellees David Fero and USA. Substitution for Attorney Miss Katherine Rae Branch for Appellees David Fero and USA. Date of service: 12/14/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12609930] [22-16680] (Kozinets, Peter) [Entered: 12/14/2022 08:37 AM]
November 14, 2022 Filing 4 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 2 ] filed by Stephen Tripodi. [12586854] (SD) [Entered: 11/14/2022 04:30 PM]
November 10, 2022 Filing 3 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 2 ] submitted by Stephen Tripodi is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12584564] (KWG) [Entered: 11/10/2022 10:07 AM]
November 9, 2022 Filing 2 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Stephen Tripodi. Date of service: 11/09/2022. [12584315] [22-16680] (Tripodi, Stephen) [Entered: 11/09/2022 10:37 PM]
October 28, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Stephen Tripodi opening brief due 12/27/2022. Appellees David Fero and United States of America answering brief due 01/25/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12575410] (JMR) [Entered: 10/28/2022 11:18 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Stephen Tripodi v. David Fero, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: STEPHEN TRIPODI
Represented By: Stephen Tripodi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID FERO
Represented By: Katherine Rae Branch
Represented By: Peter S. Kozinets
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Represented By: Katherine Rae Branch
Represented By: Peter S. Kozinets
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?