Martin Malberg v. Robert Cashen, et al
Defendant: TEMO GONZALEZ, Police Officer
Plaintiff / Appellant: MARTIN MALBERG
Defendant / Appellee: ROBERT CASHEN, Lawyer, CHRISTINE GUERRA, Lawyer and ALLISON DUNDAS, Lawyer
Case Number: 22-16703
Filed: November 1, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 10, 2023 MARTIN MALBERG V. ROBERT CASHEN, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 1, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 MANDATE ISSUED. (WCC, SRT and MBC) [12765578] (NAC) [Entered: 08/01/2023 08:57 AM]
July 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 FILED MEMORANDUM (WILLIAM C. CANBY, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and MORGAN B. CHRISTEN) AFFIRMED. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [12751607] (CPA) [Entered: 07/10/2023 11:36 AM]
March 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 11 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by appellees. [12669716] (NAR) [Entered: 03/08/2023 12:04 PM]
March 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 10 ] filed by appellees. [12669707] (NAR) [Entered: 03/08/2023 11:56 AM]
March 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 Added Attorney(s) Karen K. Stromeyer for party(s) Appellee Christine Guerra Appellee Allison Dundas Appellee Robert Cashen, in case 22-16703. [12669113] (NAC) [Entered: 03/07/2023 01:27 PM]
March 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Karen Keenan Stromeyer (Murphy Pearson Bradley & Feeney, 580 California St. Ste. 1100, San Francisco, CA 94104) for Appellees Robert Cashen, Allison Dundas and Christine Guerra. Date of service: 03/07/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12669054] [22-16703] (Stromeyer, Karen) [Entered: 03/07/2023 12:51 PM]
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 10 ] submitted by appellees is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The excerpts of record [ # 11 ] submitted by appellees are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12668361] (SML) [Entered: 03/06/2023 04:38 PM]
March 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: TAH): The appellees motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 13 ]) for an extension of time to file the answering brief is granted. The Clerk will file the answering brief (Docket Entry No. [ # 10 ]). The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after the date of this order. This order was issued prior to the expiration of time within which a response may be filed. Fed. R. App. P. 27(b). [12667975] (AF) [Entered: 03/06/2023 01:55 PM]
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellee Robert Cashen Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 03/02/2023. Date of service: 03/02/2023. [12666112] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [12] .] (TYL) [Entered: 03/02/2023 01:59 PM]
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 13 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellee Robert Cashen citation of supplemental authorities. Date of service: 02/02/2023. [12666074] [22-16703] (Weiss, Erik) [Entered: 03/02/2023 01:40 PM]
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellees Robert Cashen, Allison Dundas and Christine Guerra. Date of service: 03/02/2023. [12665775] [22-16703]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts. 03/03/2023 by SML]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated entry to correctly reflect all filers. 03/06/2023 by SML] (Weiss, Erik) [Entered: 03/02/2023 10:55 AM]
March 2, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellees Robert Cashen, Allison Dundas and Christine Guerra. Date of service: 03/02/2023. [12665767] [22-16703]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected brief. 03/03/2023 by SML]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated entry to correctly reflect all filers. 03/06/2023 by SML] (Weiss, Erik) [Entered: 03/02/2023 10:52 AM]
February 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 9 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 4 ] filed by Mr. Martin Malberg. [12649832] (SD) [Entered: 02/09/2023 11:54 AM]
January 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 8 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 4 ] submitted by Mr. Martin Malberg is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: not applicable. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12643510] (LA) [Entered: 01/31/2023 04:48 PM]
January 31, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 7 Streamlined request [5] by Appellant Mr. Martin Malberg to extend time to file the brief is not approved because it is unnecessary. The opening brief has been submitted. [12643110] (DLM) [Entered: 01/31/2023 12:31 PM]
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 6 COURT DELETED DUPLICATE ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 4 ]. Original Text: Submitted (ECF) Supplemental Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Martin Malberg. Date of service: 01/30/2023. [12642661] [22-16703] (Malberg, Martin) [Entered: 01/30/2023 11:17 PM]
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Mr. Martin Malberg. New requested due date is 02/01/2023. [12642648] [22-16703] (Malberg, Martin) [Entered: 01/30/2023 10:01 PM]
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 4 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Mr. Martin Malberg. Date of service: 01/30/2023. [12642646] [22-16703]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached searchable PDF of brief and attached Exhibit 7 (from [6]). 01/31/2023 by LA] (Malberg, Martin) [Entered: 01/30/2023 09:58 PM]
December 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 3 Streamlined request [2] by Appellant Mr. Martin Malberg to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Martin Malberg opening brief due 01/30/2023. Appellees Robert Cashen, Allison Dundas and Christine Guerra answering brief due 03/01/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12619426] (DLM) [Entered: 12/28/2022 03:31 PM]
December 28, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Mr. Martin Malberg. New requested due date is 01/30/2023. [12619255] [22-16703] (Malberg, Martin) [Entered: 12/28/2022 01:35 PM]
November 1, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Martin Malberg opening brief due 12/30/2022. Appellees Robert Cashen, Allison Dundas and Christine Guerra answering brief due 01/30/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12577615] (JMR) [Entered: 11/01/2022 10:09 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Martin Malberg v. Robert Cashen, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MARTIN MALBERG
Represented By: Martin Malberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ROBERT CASHEN, Lawyer
Represented By: Erik Peter Weiss
Represented By: Erik Peter Weiss Esquire
Represented By: Karen K. Stromeyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHRISTINE GUERRA, Lawyer
Represented By: Erik Peter Weiss
Represented By: Erik Peter Weiss Esquire
Represented By: Karen K. Stromeyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ALLISON DUNDAS, Lawyer
Represented By: Erik Peter Weiss
Represented By: Erik Peter Weiss Esquire
Represented By: Karen K. Stromeyer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TEMO GONZALEZ, Police Officer
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?