Tamara Evans v. Southern California Intergovernmental Training and
| UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; TAMARA EVANS, Relator; ex. rel. |
| SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER |
| 22-16715 |
| November 3, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutes - False Claims Act |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| TAMARA EVANS V. S. CAL. INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRAINING & DEV. CTR. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 30, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12599658] (CL) [Entered: 11/30/2022 05:18 PM] |
| Filing 12 Added Attorney(s) Gemma Seidita for party(s) Appellant Tamara Evans, in case 22-16715. [12597103] (NAC) [Entered: 11/28/2022 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 11 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Gemma Seidita (Tycko & Zavareei LLP 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20036) for Appellant Tamara Evans. Date of service: 11/28/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12597101] [22-16715] (Seidita, Gemma) [Entered: 11/28/2022 02:58 PM] |
| Filing 10 Notice of Appearance (ECF Filing) [9] is rejected. Filer is not permitted to file on behalf of another attorney. Each attorney must file their own notice of appearance. [12597077] (NAC) [Entered: 11/28/2022 02:49 PM] |
| Filing 9 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Gemma Seidita (Tycko & Zavareei LLP, 1828 L Street NW, STE 1000, Washington D.C. 20036) for Appellant Tamara Evans. Date of service: 11/28/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12597070] [22-16715] (Chappell, Glenn) [Entered: 11/28/2022 02:47 PM] |
| Filing 8 Streamlined request [7] by Appellant Tamara Evans to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Tamara Evans opening brief due 02/03/2023. Appellee Southern California Intergovernmental Training and Development Center answering brief due 03/06/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12596937] (DLM) [Entered: 11/28/2022 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Tamara Evans. New requested due date is 02/03/2023. [12596324] [22-16715] (Chappell, Glenn) [Entered: 11/28/2022 09:16 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 11/30/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12586441] (CL) [Entered: 11/14/2022 02:16 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/10/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12585437]. [22-16715] (AD) [Entered: 11/10/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Tamara Evans Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/10/2022. [12584906] [22-16715] (Chappell, Glenn) [Entered: 11/10/2022 01:11 PM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney Glenn Chappell for Appellant Tamara Evans, in case 22-16715. [12579906] (HH) [Entered: 11/03/2022 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Glenn Edward Chappell (Tycko & Zavareei LLP, 1828 L Street NW, Suite 1000 Washington, D.C. 20036) for Appellant Tamara Evans. Date of service: 11/03/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12579904] [22-16715] (Chappell, Glenn) [Entered: 11/03/2022 03:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Tamara Evans Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/10/2022. Appellant Tamara Evans opening brief due 01/04/2023. Appellee Southern California Intergovernmental Training and Development Center answering brief due 02/06/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12579687] (RT) [Entered: 11/03/2022 01:46 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Tamara Evans v. Southern California Intergovernmental Training and | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA; STATE OF CALIFORNIA; TAMARA EVANS, Relator; ex. rel. | |
| Represented By: | Glenn Chappell |
| Represented By: | Stephen R. Jaffe |
| Represented By: | Gemma Seidita |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERGOVERNMENTAL TRAINING AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER | |
| Represented By: | Steven E. Boehmer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
