Louis Branch v. N. Grannis, et al
| LOUIS BRANCH |
| N. GRANNIS, Chief, Inmate Appeals Branch, Sacramento, K. MENDOZA-POWERS, Warden, Avenal State Prison, A. MANCINAS, Classification and Parole Representative, Avenal Prison, D. UMPHENOUR, Building 250 Officer, Avenal Prison, L. SZALAI, C/O and J. ALVAREZ, C/O |
| 22-16730 |
| November 7, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 29, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Louis Branch motion to reconsider order filed on 12/14/2022. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/26/2022. [12619957] (HH) [Entered: 12/29/2022 12:36 PM] |
| Filing 5 Sent Appellant a copy of the docket sheet and the FRAP and Ninth Circuit rules in response to the Form 29 request filed on 12/14/2022. [12611185] (JR) [Entered: 12/15/2022 09:04 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Louis Branch letter dated 12/08/2022 re: Requesting copy of docket sheet and rules. Paper filing deficiency: Case closed. [12610696] (HH) [Entered: 12/14/2022 02:42 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received original and 6 copies of Appellant Louis Branch opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 12/08/2022. Major deficiency: case is closed. [12610479] (KWG) [Entered: 12/14/2022 01:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA, SIDNEY R. THOMAS and RICHARD R. CLIFTON) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Wilborn v. Escalderon, 789 F.2d 1328 (9th Cir. 1986) (denial of appointment of counsel in civil case is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12610351] (WL) [Entered: 12/14/2022 11:48 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Louis Branch opening brief due 01/03/2023. Appellees J. Alvarez, N. Grannis, A. Mancinas, K. Mendoza-Powers, L. Szalai and D. Umphenour answering brief due 02/02/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12581350] (ABT) [Entered: 11/07/2022 10:31 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
