Peridot Tree, Inc., et al v. City of Sacramento, et al
Defendant: SACRAMENTO OFFICE OF CANNABIS MANAGEMENT
Plaintiff / Appellant: PERIDOT TREE, INC. and KENNETH GAY
Defendant / Appellee: CITY OF SACRAMENTO and DAVINA SMITH
Case Number: 22-16783
Filed: November 17, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Constitutionality of State Statutes

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 4, 2024 Summary PERIDOT TREE, INC. V. CITY OF SACRAMENTO

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 19, 2022 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. [12613970] (VS) [Entered: 12/19/2022 01:41 PM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 6 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/01/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12600153]. [22-16783] (AD) [Entered: 12/01/2022 12:44 PM]
December 1, 2022 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellee City of Sacramento Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/01/2022. [12599925] [22-16783] (Day, Matthew) [Entered: 12/01/2022 09:56 AM]
November 28, 2022 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 12/12/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12596156] (VS) [Entered: 11/27/2022 04:43 PM]
November 21, 2022 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/21/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12593368]. [22-16783] (AD) [Entered: 11/21/2022 06:44 PM]
November 21, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellants Kenneth Gay and Peridot Tree, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/21/2022. [12592743] [22-16783] (Kernkamp, Christian) [Entered: 11/21/2022 02:04 PM]
November 17, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Kenneth Gay and Peridot Tree, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/25/2022. Transcript ordered by 12/15/2022. Transcript due 01/17/2023. Appellants Kenneth Gay and Peridot Tree, Inc. opening brief due 02/23/2023. Appellees City of Sacramento and Davina Smith answering brief due 03/27/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12590289] (JMR) [Entered: 11/17/2022 02:27 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Peridot Tree, Inc., et al v. City of Sacramento, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PERIDOT TREE, INC.
Represented By: Christian Kernkamp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: KENNETH GAY
Represented By: Christian Kernkamp
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CITY OF SACRAMENTO
Represented By: Matthew R. Day
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVINA SMITH
Represented By: Matthew R. Day
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SACRAMENTO OFFICE OF CANNABIS MANAGEMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?