Sir Davis v. Wag Labs, Inc., et al
| UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John and Jane Does 1-5, black entities 1-5 |
| SIR LAWRENCE DAVIS, an individual |
| WAG LABS, INC., named as Wag! Labs Incorporated, a Delaware corporation, DAVID CANE, an individual and J. D. KEMPER, spouse |
| 22-16802 |
| November 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Jobs |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Phoenix. Please consult with opposing counsel and review the Phoenix sitting dates for November 2023 at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation). You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [12753038] (CSR) [Entered: 07/11/2023 02:19 PM] |
| Filing 24 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Phoenix. Please review the Phoenix sitting dates for October 16-20, 2023 at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation). [12734754] (CSR) [Entered: 06/13/2023 11:30 AM] |
| Filing 23 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 21 ] filed by Appellees. [12727941] (SD) [Entered: 06/02/2023 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 22 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 21 ] submitted by appellees is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12726070] (LA) [Entered: 05/31/2023 04:40 PM] |
| Filing 21 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellees David Cane, J. D. Kemper and Wag Labs, Inc.. Date of service: 05/30/2023. [12724994] [22-16802] (Peters, Kristy) [Entered: 05/30/2023 04:51 PM] |
| Filing 20 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 14 ] filed by Sir Lawrence Davis. [12689606] (NAR) [Entered: 04/05/2023 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 19 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 15 ] in 4 volume(s) and index volume filed by Sir Lawrence Davis. [12689605] (NAR) [Entered: 04/05/2023 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 18 Streamlined request [16] by Appellees David Cane, J. D. Kemper and Wag Labs, Inc. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellees David Cane, J. D. Kemper and Wag Labs, Inc. answering brief due 05/30/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12686537] (BG) [Entered: 03/31/2023 12:39 PM] |
| Filing 17 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 14 ] submitted by Sir Lawrence Davis is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 15 ] submitted by Sir Lawrence Davis are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12686426] (LA) [Entered: 03/31/2023 11:04 AM] |
| Filing 16 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellees David Cane, J. D. Kemper and Wag Labs, Inc.. New requested due date is 05/30/2023. [12685869] [22-16802] (Peters, Kristy) [Entered: 03/30/2023 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 15 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Sir Lawrence Davis. Date of service: 03/29/2023. [12684824] [22-16802]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected excerpts. 03/31/2023 by LA] (Houk, Christopher) [Entered: 03/29/2023 01:55 PM] |
| Filing 14 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Sir Lawrence Davis. Date of service: 03/29/2023. [12684819] [22-16802]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDF. 03/31/2023 by LA] (Houk, Christopher) [Entered: 03/29/2023 01:51 PM] |
| Filing 13 Streamlined request [12] by Appellant Sir Lawrence Davis to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamlined requests allow for a 30 day extension of time to file the brief. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Sir Lawrence Davis opening brief due 03/29/2023. Appellees J. D. Kemper and Wag Labs, Inc. answering brief due 04/28/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12655753] (DR) [Entered: 02/17/2023 11:14 AM] |
| Filing 12 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Sir Lawrence Davis. New requested due date is 03/27/2023. [12655689] [22-16802] (Houk, Christopher) [Entered: 02/17/2023 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 11 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including request for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk's Office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12638825] (VS) [Entered: 01/25/2023 04:14 PM] |
| Filing 10 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Conference w/ counsel for appellees, 01/25/2023, 10:30 a.m., Pacific Time. See order for details. [12632614] (VS) [Entered: 01/18/2023 10:47 AM] |
| Filing 9 Added Attorney Kristy L. Peters for Appellee Wag Labs, Inc., in case 22-16802. [12631956] (HH) [Entered: 01/17/2023 03:42 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Kristy L Peters - AZ Bar No. 024756 (Littler Mendelson, P.C. 2425 E Camelback Rd #900, Phoenix, AZ 85016) for Appellees Wag Labs, Inc., David Cane and J. D. Kemper. Date of service: 01/17/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12631943] [22-16802] (Peters, Kristy) [Entered: 01/17/2023 03:35 PM] |
| Filing 7 Attorney Kristy L. Peters in 22-16802 substituted by Attorney Yijee Jeong in 22-16802 [12631877] (NAC) [Entered: 01/17/2023 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Yijee Jeong Bar No. 033287 (Littler Mendelson, P.C. 2425 E Camelback Rd #900, Phoenix, AZ 85016) for Appellees Wag Labs, Inc., David Cane and J. D. Kemper. Substitution for Attorney Mr. Christopher R. Houk, Esquire for Appellant Sir Lawrence Davis and Attorney Kristy L. Peters for Appellees David Cane, J. D. Kemper and Wag Labs, Inc.. Date of service: 01/17/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12631837] [22-16802] (Jeong, Yijee) [Entered: 01/17/2023 02:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 01/18/2023, 10:00 a.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12602757] (VS) [Entered: 12/05/2022 04:36 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 11/30/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12599056]. [22-16802] (AD) [Entered: 11/30/2022 12:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Sir Lawrence Davis Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 11/30/2022. [12598616] [22-16802] (Houk, Christopher) [Entered: 11/30/2022 08:01 AM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12594949] (DJV) [Entered: 11/23/2022 11:35 AM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Sir Lawrence Davis Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/30/2022. Transcript ordered by 12/20/2022. Transcript due 01/20/2023. Appellant Sir Lawrence Davis opening brief due 02/27/2023. Appellees David Cane, J. D. Kemper and Wag Labs, Inc. answering brief due 03/27/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12594924] (RT) [Entered: 11/23/2022 11:16 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
