Brian Best v. Virgil Smith, et al
Defendant: SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT, JOHN DOE, a Sonoma County Sheriff Deputy, SONOMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS, SONOMA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, RICH CELLI, Sonoma County District Attorney's Office, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, ANDREW CASH and RONALD CHESTNUT, Sonoma County Grand Jury
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRIAN BEST
Defendant / Appellee: VIRGIL SMITH
Case Number: 22-16809
Filed: November 23, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other Civil Rights
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 20, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 20, 2023 Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellee Virgil Smith reply to response (). Date of service: 01/20/2023. [12635047] [22-16809] (King, Michael) [Entered: 01/20/2023 02:25 PM]
January 17, 2023 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Brian Best Motion to complete production of Reporters Transcript at government expense, Motion for injunction pending appeal, Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 05/23/2023, Motion for appointment of pro bono counsel, Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Date of service: 01/17/2023. [12632259] [22-16809] (Best, Brian) [Entered: 01/17/2023 11:16 PM]
January 13, 2023 Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Mr. Brian Best response opposing motion ([ # 4 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 4 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion for summary disposition). Date of service: 01/13/2023. [12630801] [22-16809] (Best, Brian) [Entered: 01/13/2023 07:32 PM]
January 5, 2023 Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellee Virgil Smith Motion for summary disposition. Date of service: 01/05/2023. [12623872] [22-16809] (King, Michael) [Entered: 01/05/2023 01:54 PM]
November 30, 2022 Filing 3 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 22-16809: Due] ). [12599140] (MF) [Entered: 11/30/2022 01:37 PM]
November 25, 2022 Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12595794] (DJV) [Entered: 11/25/2022 01:17 PM]
November 23, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Brian Best opening brief due 01/23/2023. Appellee Virgil Smith answering brief due 02/23/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12595324] (RT) [Entered: 11/23/2022 03:10 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Brian Best v. Virgil Smith, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BRIAN BEST
Represented By: Brian Best
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: VIRGIL SMITH
Represented By: Michael Alcock King
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SONOMA COUNTY SHERIFF DEPARTMENT
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE, a Sonoma County Sheriff Deputy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SONOMA COUNTY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: SONOMA COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY'S OFFICE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RICH CELLI, Sonoma County District Attorney's Office
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ANDREW CASH
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: RONALD CHESTNUT, Sonoma County Grand Jury
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?