Jacob Benson, et al v. Continuing Care Risk Retention Group, Inc., et al
Defendant: CASA DE CAPRI ENTERPRISES, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company and UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does 1-20; ABC Corporations I-X; XYZ Partnerships I-X
Plaintiff / Appellee: JACOB BENSON, an individual, JOSEPH BENSON, DEBORAH BENSON, husband and wife and K. B., a minor, by and through Jacob Benson, guardian ad litem
Defendant / Appellant: CONTINUING CARE RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC., Garnishee
Case Number: 22-16829
Filed: November 29, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Insurance

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
November 20, 2023 JACOB BENSON, ET AL V. CONTINUING CARE RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC., ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 22, 2023 Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellant Continuing Care Risk Retention Group, Inc. Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 06/05/2023. Date of service: 03/22/2023. [12679785] [22-16829] (Ehlert, Shauna) [Entered: 03/22/2023 03:04 PM]
February 16, 2023 Filing 9 Streamlined request [8] by Appellant Continuing Care Risk Retention Group, Inc. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Continuing Care Risk Retention Group, Inc. opening brief due 04/05/2023. Appellees K. B., Deborah Benson, Jacob Benson and Joseph Benson answering brief due 05/05/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12655092] (BG) [Entered: 02/16/2023 03:01 PM]
February 16, 2023 Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Continuing Care Risk Retention Group, Inc.. New requested due date is 04/05/2023. [12655019] [22-16829] (Sutton, Terri) [Entered: 02/16/2023 02:33 PM]
January 25, 2023 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including request for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk's Office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12638818] (VS) [Entered: 01/25/2023 04:11 PM]
January 4, 2023 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 01/25/2023, 2:00 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12623003] (VS) [Entered: 01/04/2023 02:48 PM]
December 12, 2022 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 12/27/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12607658] (VS) [Entered: 12/12/2022 09:16 AM]
December 6, 2022 Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/06/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12603964]. [22-16829] (AD) [Entered: 12/06/2022 06:44 PM]
December 6, 2022 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Continuing Care Risk Retention Group, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/06/2022. [12603769] [22-16829] (Ehlert, Shauna) [Entered: 12/06/2022 03:34 PM]
December 2, 2022 Filing 2 Added Attorney(s) Shauna Ehlert for party(s) Appellant Continuing Care Risk Retention Group, Inc., in case 22-16829. [12600962] (RT) [Entered: 12/02/2022 12:12 PM]
November 29, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Continuing Care Risk Retention Group, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/06/2022. Transcript ordered by 12/28/2022. Transcript due 01/27/2023. Appellant Continuing Care Risk Retention Group, Inc. opening brief due 03/06/2023. Appellees K. B., Deborah Benson, Jacob Benson and Joseph Benson answering brief due 04/06/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12597980] (RT) [Entered: 11/29/2022 12:07 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Jacob Benson, et al v. Continuing Care Risk Retention Group, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: JACOB BENSON, an individual
Represented By: Steven S. Guy
Represented By: David Richard Schwartz
Represented By: Harold Wright Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: JOSEPH BENSON
Represented By: Steven S. Guy
Represented By: David Richard Schwartz
Represented By: Harold Wright Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: DEBORAH BENSON, husband and wife
Represented By: David Richard Schwartz
Represented By: Steven S. Guy
Represented By: Harold Wright Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: K. B., a minor, by and through Jacob Benson, guardian ad litem
Represented By: Steven S. Guy
Represented By: David Richard Schwartz
Represented By: Harold Wright Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CONTINUING CARE RISK RETENTION GROUP, INC., Garnishee
Represented By: Steven G. Mesaros
Represented By: Michael John Schroeder Esquire
Represented By: Terri A. Sutton
Represented By: Shauna Ehlert
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CASA DE CAPRI ENTERPRISES, LLC, an Arizona limited liability company
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: UNKNOWN PARTIES, named as John Does 1-20; ABC Corporations I-X; XYZ Partnerships I-X
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?