Jermaine Hampton v. State of Nevada, et al
| JERMAINE HAMPTON |
| STATE OF NEVADA, CITY OF LAS VEGAS, T. EDWARD, Detective P#9035, SARAH OVERLY, STEPHANIE GETTER and D. LUNT, Officer |
| 22-16843 |
| November 30, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Streamlined request by Appellant Jermaine Hampton to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamlined requests allow for 30 days. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Jermaine Hampton opening brief due 03/01/2023. Appellees City of Las Vegas, T. Edward, Stephanie Getter, D. Lunt, Sarah Overly and State of Nevada answering brief due 03/31/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12631443] (BG) [Entered: 01/17/2023 11:07 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 12/30/2022. [12620711] (RT) [Entered: 12/30/2022 03:02 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12607518] (CKP) [Entered: 12/11/2022 03:53 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jermaine Hampton opening brief due 01/30/2023. Appellees City of Las Vegas, T. Edward, Stephanie Getter, D. Lunt, Sarah Overly and State of Nevada answering brief due 02/27/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12599220] (JMR) [Entered: 11/30/2022 02:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
