Anthony Anderson v. State of Nevada, et al
| ANTHONY K. ANDERSON |
| STATE OF NEVADA and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF NEVADA |
| 22-16856 |
| December 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| ANTHONY ANDERSON V. STATE OF NEVADA, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Anthony K. Anderson FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/10/2023. [12629491] (RL) [Entered: 01/12/2023 01:56 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12620941] (CKP) [Entered: 01/02/2023 11:41 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Anthony K. Anderson motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/23/2022. [12620719] (BJK) [Entered: 12/30/2022 03:18 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Anthony K. Anderson multiple Form 27 motions concerning preliminary injunction. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/23/2022. [12620717] (BJK) [Entered: 12/30/2022 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed original and 6 copies of Appellant Anthony K. Anderson opening brief of 9 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 12/23/2022. [12620563] (LA) [Entered: 12/30/2022 01:32 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Anthony K. Anderson opening brief due 01/27/2023. [12601210] (ABT) [Entered: 12/02/2022 02:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
