Lopez-Pina v. Garland
Petitioner: RAUL LOPEZ-PINA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-1686
Filed: October 12, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on August 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
August 22, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER FILED. Petitioner has failed to file the opening brief in this case. Pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1, this case is dismissed for failure to prosecute. This order will be served on the agency and will become the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 08/22/2023 09:06 AM]
May 16, 2023 Filing 22 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Petitioner Benjamin Wiesinger representing Petitioner Raul Lopez-Pina. [Entered: 05/16/2023 09:04 AM]
May 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER FILED. The motion (Docket Entry No. 20) of Benjamin Wiesinger to withdraw as counsel for petitioner is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect that petitioner is proceeding pro se. Petitioners request (included in Docket Entry No. 20) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is now due July 17, 2023. The answering brief is due September 15, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. The Clerk will provide a copy of the pro se case opening packet, along with a copy of this order to petitioner at: 725 W. Michelle Dr., Phoenix, Arizona 85023. [Entered: 05/16/2023 09:02 AM]
May 12, 2023 Filing 20 MOTION to withdraw as counsel filed by Benjamin Wiesinger for Petitioner Raul Lopez-Pina. [Entered: 05/12/2023 09:08 AM]
March 16, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 18) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due May 16, 2023. The answering brief is due July 17, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 03/16/2023 10:31 AM]
March 14, 2023 Filing 18 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Raul Lopez-Pina. [Entered: 03/14/2023 05:13 PM]
February 10, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 16) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due March 17, 2023. The answering brief is due May 16, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 02/10/2023 02:01 PM]
February 10, 2023 Filing 16 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Raul Lopez-Pina. [Entered: 02/10/2023 09:14 AM]
January 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 14) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/15/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 4/17/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 01/17/2023 02:45 PM]
January 13, 2023 Filing 14 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Raul Lopez-Pina. [Entered: 01/13/2023 08:51 AM]
November 23, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED. The government did not timely respond to the motion for stay of removal. The absence of a response is treated as a statement of non-opposition; the temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 11/23/2022 08:54 AM]
October 28, 2022 Filing 11 Motion to Stay Removal filed at DE 9; Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed after PFR) due 11/17/2022. [Entered: 10/28/2022 10:17 AM]
October 28, 2022 Filing 10 Fee Paid by Raul Lopez-Pina. Fee Receipt Number: A09-2602515-ACMS. [Entered: 10/28/2022 08:44 AM]
October 27, 2022 Filing 12 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [COURT ENTERD FILING to correct DE 9.] [Entered: 11/22/2022 03:21 PM]
October 27, 2022 Filing 9 DEFECTIVE --- MOTION for Stay Pending Review (Fed. R. App. P. 18) filed by Petitioner Raul Lopez-Pina. Wrong filing type used. See correct entry at DE 12. [Entered: 10/27/2022 11:23 AM] [Edited: 11/22/2022 03:23 PM]
October 26, 2022 Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 10/26/2022 08:57 AM]
October 20, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER FILED. To proceed in this court, petitioner must pay a $500 filing fee or seek in forma pauperis status. If petitioner does not pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis within 28 days of this order, the petition may be dismissed for failure to comply. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The Clerk will serve a Form 4 financial affidavit on petitioner. [Entered: 10/20/2022 09:20 AM]
October 14, 2022 Filing 6 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Jonathan Needle for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/14/2022 01:26 PM]
October 14, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jonathan Needle for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/14/2022 08:39 AM]
October 12, 2022 Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 11/16/2022, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/16/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 3/16/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/12/2022 04:09 PM]
October 12, 2022 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/12/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1686 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/12/2022 04:07 PM]
October 12, 2022 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 9/14/2022. [Entered: 10/12/2022 04:06 PM]
October 12, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/12/2022 04:06 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lopez-Pina v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: RAUL LOPEZ-PINA
Represented By: Raul Lopez-Pina
Represented By: Benjamin Wiesinger
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Mr. Jonathan Needle
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?