Purushothaman Rajaram v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellant: PURUSHOTHAMAN RAJARAM
Defendant / Appellee: META PLATFORMS, INC., FKA Facebook, Inc.
Case Number: 22-16870
Filed: December 6, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 4, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 4, 2023 Filing 38 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED TO MARSHA S. BERZON, ERIC D. MILLER and LAWRENCE VANDYKE. The audio and video recordings of this hearing are available on our website at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/ . [12805551] (SVG) [Entered: 10/05/2023 03:32 PM]
September 10, 2023 Filing 37 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. Daniel L. Low, Esquire for Appellant Purushothaman Rajaram. Hearing in Other (University of Hawaii Manoa) on 10/04/2023 at 9:30 (Courtroom: Moot Courtroom). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15) Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear by video. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 09/10/2023. [12789364] [22-16870] (Low, Daniel) [Entered: 09/10/2023 05:16 AM]
September 8, 2023 Filing 36 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Lauren R. Goldman for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Hearing in Other (University of Hawaii Manoa) on 10/04/2023 at 9:30 AM (Courtroom: Moot Courtroom). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15) Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear by video. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 09/08/2023. [12789336] [22-16870] (Goldman, Lauren) [Entered: 09/08/2023 10:19 PM]
September 7, 2023 Filing 35 Notice of Oral Argument on Wednesday, October 4, 2023 - 09:30 A.M. - Moot Courtroom - Scheduled Location: University of Hawaii Manoa. The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may have the option to appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. Anyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available # here . At this time, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion. The court expects and supports the fact that some attorneys and some judges will continue to appear remotely. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you do elect to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 28 days before Wednesday, October 4, 2023. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[12788489]. [22-16870] (KS) [Entered: 09/07/2023 03:46 PM]
August 22, 2023 Filing 34 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Mr. Daniel L. Low, Esquire for Appellant Purushothaman Rajaram. Hearing in Other (University of Hawaii Manoa) on 10/04/2023 at 9:00 a.m. (Courtroom: Moot Courtroom). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15) Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear by video. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 08/22/2023. [12778572] [22-16870] (Low, Daniel) [Entered: 08/22/2023 10:44 AM]
August 21, 2023 Filing 33 Filed (ECF) Acknowledgment of hearing notice by Attorney Lauren R. Goldman for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Hearing in Other (University of Hawaii Manoa) on 10/04/2023 at 9:00 AM (Courtroom: Moot Courtroom). Filer sharing argument time: No. (Argument minutes: 15) Appearance in person or by video: I wish to appear in person. Special accommodations: NO. Filer admission status: I certify that I am admitted to practice before this Court. Date of service: 08/21/2023. [12778287] [22-16870] (Goldman, Lauren) [Entered: 08/21/2023 05:28 PM]
July 24, 2023 Filing 32 Notice of Oral Argument on Wednesday, October 4, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Moot Courtroom - Scheduled Location: University of Hawaii Manoa. The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may have the option to appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. Anyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available # here . At this time, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion. The court expects and supports the fact that some attorneys and some judges will continue to appear remotely. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you do elect to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 28 days before Wednesday, October 4, 2023. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[12761163]. [22-16870] (KS) [Entered: 07/24/2023 06:04 PM]
July 24, 2023 Filing 31 Notice of Oral Argument on Wednesday, October 4, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Moot Courtroom - Scheduled Location: University of Hawaii Manoa. The hearing time is the local time zone at the scheduled hearing location. View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case # here . NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may have the option to appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. Anyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available # here . At this time, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion. The court expects and supports the fact that some attorneys and some judges will continue to appear remotely. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you do elect to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the # GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing, including when to be available (30 minutes before the hearing time) and when and how to submit additional citations (filing electronically as far in advance of the hearing as possible). If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the # ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in CM/ECF no later than 28 days before Wednesday, October 4, 2023. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice.[12760843]. [22-16870] (KS) [Entered: 07/24/2023 03:51 PM]
June 16, 2023 Filing 30 Filed (ECF) Attorney Mr. Daniel L. Low, Esquire for Appellant Purushothaman Rajaram response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 06/16/2023. [12737487] [22-16870] (Low, Daniel) [Entered: 06/16/2023 08:20 AM]
June 16, 2023 Filing 29 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Honolulu. Please review the Honolulu sitting dates for October 2-6, 2023 at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation). [12737467] (CSR) [Entered: 06/16/2023 08:01 AM]
June 7, 2023 Filing 28 Filed (ECF) Attorney Mr. Daniel L. Low, Esquire for Appellant Purushothaman Rajaram response to notice for case being considered for oral argument. Date of service: 06/07/2023. [12730955] [22-16870] (Low, Daniel) [Entered: 06/07/2023 01:41 PM]
June 7, 2023 Filing 27 This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Las Vegas. Please review the Las Vegas sitting dates for October 2-6, 2023 at # http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions . If you have an unavoidable conflict on any of the dates, please file # Form 32 within 3 business days of this notice using the CM/ECF filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument . Please follow the form's # instructions carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a letter within 3 business days of this notice , using CM/ECF ( Type of Document : Correspondence to Court; Subject : request for mediation). [12730488] (CSR) [Entered: 06/07/2023 07:44 AM]
May 31, 2023 Filing 26 Received 6 paper copies of Reply Brief [ # 24 ] filed by Purushothaman Rajaram. [12725514] (SD) [Entered: 05/31/2023 11:35 AM]
May 24, 2023 Filing 25 Filed clerk order: The reply brief [ # 24 ] submitted by Purushothaman Rajaram is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: gray. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12721723] (SML) [Entered: 05/24/2023 10:30 AM]
May 23, 2023 Filing 24 Submitted (ECF) Reply Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Purushothaman Rajaram. Date of service: 05/23/2023. [12720860] [22-16870] (Low, Daniel) [Entered: 05/23/2023 09:46 AM]
May 5, 2023 Filing 23 Streamlined request [22] by Appellant Purushothaman Rajaram to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamline requests allow for 30 day extensions. Amended briefing schedule: the optional reply brief is due 06/12/2023. [12709789] (DLM) [Entered: 05/05/2023 11:29 AM]
May 5, 2023 Filing 22 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Reply Brief by Appellant Purushothaman Rajaram. New requested due date is 06/09/2023. [12709500] [22-16870] (Low, Daniel) [Entered: 05/05/2023 08:19 AM]
April 26, 2023 Filing 21 Received 6 paper copies of Answering Brief [ # 19 ] filed by Meta Platforms, Inc.. [12703583] (SD) [Entered: 04/26/2023 02:18 PM]
April 25, 2023 Filing 20 Filed clerk order: The answering brief [ # 19 ] submitted by Meta Platforms, Inc. is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: red. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12702197] (SML) [Entered: 04/25/2023 09:04 AM]
April 21, 2023 Filing 19 Submitted (ECF) Answering Brief for review. Submitted by Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Date of service: 04/21/2023. [12700936] [22-16870] (Goldman, Lauren) [Entered: 04/21/2023 08:20 PM]
April 3, 2023 Filing 18 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: GS): Granting Motion [ # 17 ] (ECF Filing) filed by Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.; Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. answering brief due 04/21/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12687998] (GS) [Entered: 04/03/2023 04:11 PM]
April 3, 2023 Filing 17 Filed (ECF) Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. Unopposed Motion to extend time to file Answering brief until 04/21/2023. Date of service: 04/03/2023. [12687718] [22-16870] (Goldman, Lauren) [Entered: 04/03/2023 01:53 PM]
February 14, 2023 Filing 16 Received 6 paper copies of Opening Brief [ # 6 ] filed by Purushothaman Rajaram. [12653095] (SD) [Entered: 02/14/2023 02:59 PM]
February 14, 2023 Filing 15 Received 3 paper copies of excerpts of record [ # 7 ] in 1 volume(s) filed by Appellant Purushothaman Rajaram. [12653089] (SD) [Entered: 02/14/2023 02:57 PM]
February 10, 2023 Filing 14 Streamlined request [13] by Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. answering brief due 04/07/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12650829] (DR) [Entered: 02/10/2023 12:42 PM]
February 10, 2023 Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Answering Brief by Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. New requested due date is 04/07/2023. [12650746] [22-16870] (Adler, Daniel) [Entered: 02/10/2023 12:03 PM]
February 10, 2023 Filing 12 Added Attorney(s) Lauren R. Goldman for party(s) Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc., in case 22-16870. [12650735] (QDL) [Entered: 02/10/2023 11:56 AM]
February 10, 2023 Filing 11 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Lauren R. Goldman (Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 200 Park Ave, New York, NY 10166) for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Date of service: 02/10/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12650731] [22-16870] (Goldman, Lauren) [Entered: 02/10/2023 11:55 AM]
February 10, 2023 Filing 10 Added Attorney(s) Daniel R. Adler for party(s) Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc., in case 22-16870. [12650728] (QDL) [Entered: 02/10/2023 11:55 AM]
February 10, 2023 Filing 9 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Daniel Rolf Adler (Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP, 333 South Grand Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90071) for Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc.. Date of service: 02/10/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12650720] [22-16870] (Adler, Daniel) [Entered: 02/10/2023 11:53 AM]
February 7, 2023 Filing 8 Filed clerk order: The opening brief [ # 6 ] submitted by Purushothaman Rajaram is filed. Within 7 days of the filing of this order, filer is ordered to file 6 copies of the brief in paper format, accompanied by certification (attached to the end of each copy of the brief) that the brief is identical to the version submitted electronically. Cover color: blue. The excerpts of record [ # 7 ] submitted by Purushothaman Rajaram are filed. Within 7 days of this order, filer is ordered to file 3 copies of the excerpts in paper format securely bound on the left side, with white covers. The paper copies shall be submitted to the principal office of the Clerk. [12647673] (KWG) [Entered: 02/07/2023 09:08 AM]
February 6, 2023 Filing 7 Submitted (ECF) excerpts of record. Submitted by Appellant Purushothaman Rajaram. Date of service: 02/06/2023. [12646577] [22-16870] (Low, Daniel) [Entered: 02/06/2023 09:08 AM]
February 6, 2023 Filing 6 Submitted (ECF) Opening Brief for review. Submitted by Appellant Purushothaman Rajaram. Date of service: 02/06/2023. [12646567] [22-16870] (Low, Daniel) [Entered: 02/06/2023 09:05 AM]
January 3, 2023 Filing 5 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12621164] (CL) [Entered: 01/03/2023 09:24 AM]
December 15, 2022 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 12/29/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12611237] (CL) [Entered: 12/15/2022 09:34 AM]
December 13, 2022 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/13/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12609329]. [22-16870] (AD) [Entered: 12/13/2022 12:44 PM]
December 13, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Purushothaman Rajaram Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/13/2022. [12608874] [22-16870] (Low, Daniel) [Entered: 12/13/2022 08:47 AM]
December 6, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Purushothaman Rajaram Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/13/2022. Appellant Purushothaman Rajaram opening brief due 02/06/2023. Appellee Meta Platforms, Inc. answering brief due 03/08/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12603731] (JBS) [Entered: 12/06/2022 03:09 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Purushothaman Rajaram v. Meta Platforms, Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: PURUSHOTHAMAN RAJARAM
Represented By: Daniel L. Low Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: META PLATFORMS, INC., FKA Facebook, Inc.
Represented By: Gabrielle Levin
Represented By: Michele L. Maryott Esquire
Represented By: Daniel R. Adler
Represented By: Lauren R. Goldman
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?