Debra Slayton v. Kilolo Kijakazi
| DEBRA J. SLAYTON |
| KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security |
| 22-16883 |
| December 8, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| D.I.W.C./D.I.W.W. |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 12, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 12/08/2022. [12608083] (RT) [Entered: 12/12/2022 01:08 PM] |
| Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/09/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12607477]. [22-16883] (AD) [Entered: 12/09/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The Mediation Program of the Ninth Cir. Court of Appeals facilitates settlement while appeals are pending. See FRAP 33 & Ninth Cir.R. 33-1. Mediation assessment conferences are not routinely scheduled in social security appeals. Csl are encouraged to contact circuit mediator if they believe this social security appeal has remand potential or is otherwise amenable to resolution. Specifically, csl are requested to contact the mediator if claimant has been awarded benefits after the district court's decision or if claimant is deceased. The mediator can also assist csl with procedural matters that may lead to the resolution of an appeal. Csl for the party contacting the Mediation Program are encouraged to copy csl for the other party to the appeal on any such requests. Info regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [12607233] (VS) [Entered: 12/09/2022 03:15 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Debra J. Slayton Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/09/2022. [12607107] [22-16883] (Sackett, Harvey) [Entered: 12/09/2022 02:23 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Debra J. Slayton Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/15/2022. Appellant Debra J. Slayton opening brief due 02/06/2023. Appellee Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security answering brief due 03/07/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12605427] (JMR) [Entered: 12/08/2022 11:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Debra Slayton v. Kilolo Kijakazi | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: DEBRA J. SLAYTON | |
| Represented By: | Harvey P. Sackett |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting Commissioner of Social Security | |
| Represented By: | Michelle Lo |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
