Kenneth Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: KENNETH L. LENK
Defendant / Appellee: MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC. and MAURICE SCIAMMAS, Senior VP of Monolitchic Power Systems, Inc.
Case Number: 22-16892
Filed: December 12, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 29, 2023 Filing 16 Filed (ECF) Appellees Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Maurice Sciammas Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 09/29/2023. [12801312] [22-16892]--[COURT UPDATE: Attached PDF of certificate of service. 09/29/2023 by SLM] (Carp, Dylan) [Entered: 09/29/2023 10:45 AM]
September 5, 2023 Filing 15 Filed original and 6 copies of Appellant Kenneth L. Lenk opening brief of 27 pages (Informal: No). Served on 09/01/2023. [12786618] (KT) [Entered: 09/05/2023 02:36 PM]
July 19, 2023 Filing 14 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): Granting Motion[ # 13 ] to extend time to file appellant brief filed by Appellant Kenneth L. Lenk Appellant Kenneth L. Lenk opening brief due 09/05/2023. Appellees Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Maurice Sciammas answering brief due 10/04/2023 The optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief.; Granting Party Motion filed by Appellant Kenneth L. Lenk [12757876] (LKK) [Entered: 07/19/2023 10:33 AM]
July 17, 2023 Filing 13 Filed Appellant Kenneth L. Lenk motion to extend time to file appellant opening brief until 09/05/2023. Deficiencies: None. Served on 07/13/2023. [12757582] (BJK) [Entered: 07/18/2023 04:31 PM]
July 7, 2023 Filing 12 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the district courts docket reflects that appellant paid the fees for this appeal. The opening brief is due August 7, 2023. The answering brief is due September 6, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. If appellant does not file excerpts of record, appellees must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief. See id. Failure to timely file the opening brief will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [12750795] (RT) [Entered: 07/07/2023 02:27 PM]
July 3, 2023 Filing 11 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 06/20/2023. [12748625] (BJK) [Entered: 07/05/2023 10:52 AM]
June 26, 2023 Filing 10 Filed Appellant Kenneth L. Lenk letter dated 06/20/2023 re:.notice of intent to prosecute appeals Paper filing deficiency: None. [12744550] (BJK) [Entered: 06/28/2023 09:58 AM]
June 26, 2023 Filing 9 Check number 2291 in the amount of $505.00, forwarded to district court. [12742988] (JR) [Entered: 06/26/2023 02:13 PM]
June 2, 2023 Filing 8 Filed order (Appellate Commissioner: Lisa B. Fitzgerald ): Appellants request to hold appellate proceedings in abeyance (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ] is denied. Appellant has not complied with the courts December 14, 2022, and April 13, 2023, orders directing appellant to pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal, or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. Appellant must either pay the fees to the district court, or file a motion to waive fees in this court, within 21 days of this order. Failure to do so will result in dismissalof this casefor failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. No further extensions of time to pay the fees or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. [12727953] (RT) [Entered: 06/02/2023 04:27 PM]
May 8, 2023 Filing 7 Received Appellant Kenneth L. Lenk's Amended Notice of Appeal in response to court order of 4/13/23. Served on 04/29/2023. [12712376] (BJK) [Entered: 05/09/2023 02:54 PM]
April 13, 2023 Filing 6 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DA): On December 14, 2022, this court issued an order directing appellant to pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal, or file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. On January 6, 2023, appellant filed a motion to hold this appeal in abeyance, but did not address the filing and docketing fees. Appellants motion to hold this appeal in abeyance [ # 5 ] is denied. Within 21 days from the date of this order, appellant must either pay $505.00 to the district court as the docketing and filing fees for this appeal, or submit to this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. The opening brief is now due May 10, 2023. The answering brief is due June 9, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after the date of this order. Because appellant is proceeding without counsel, appellant is not required to file excerpts of record. See 9th Cir. R. 30-1.3. If appellant does not file excerpts of record, appellees must file Supplemental Excerpts of Record that contain all of the documents that are cited in the pro se opening brief or otherwise required by Rule 30-1.4, as well as the documents that are cited in the answering brief. See id. The filing of a motion to proceed in forma pauperis will automatically stay the briefing schedule under Ninth Circuit Rule 27-11. If appellant fails to comply with this order, the appeal will be dismissed automatically by the Clerk under Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. The Clerk will send appellant a Form 4 financial affidavit. [12694917] (CKP) [Entered: 04/13/2023 10:57 AM]
January 6, 2023 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Kenneth L. Lenk Amended Notice to Appeal and motion to hold case in abeyance. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/31/2022. [12625134] (BJK) [Entered: 01/06/2023 04:26 PM]
December 29, 2022 Filing 4 Attorneys Hope Anne Case, Adrianna Rubino, and Jeffrey Alan Snyder substituted by Attorney Dylan Bradley Carp. [12619779] (RL) [Entered: 12/29/2022 10:08 AM]
December 28, 2022 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Dylan Bradley Carp (Jackson Lewis P.C., 50 California Street, 9th Floor, San Francisco, California 94111-4615) for Appellees Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Maurice Sciammas. Substitution for Hope Anne Case for Appellees Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Maurice Sciammas, Adrianna Rubino for Appellees Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Maurice Sciammas and Mr. Jeffrey Alan Snyder, Esquire for Appellees Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Maurice Sciammas. Date of service: 12/28/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12619573] [22-16892] (Carp, Dylan) [Entered: 12/28/2022 05:31 PM]
December 14, 2022 Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12610775] (CKP) [Entered: 12/14/2022 03:14 PM]
December 12, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kenneth L. Lenk opening brief due 02/13/2023. Appellees Monolithic Power Systems, Inc. and Maurice Sciammas answering brief due 03/13/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12607868] (RT) [Entered: 12/12/2022 10:56 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kenneth Lenk v. Monolithic Power Systems, Inc., et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: KENNETH L. LENK
Represented By: Kenneth L. Lenk
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MONOLITHIC POWER SYSTEMS, INC.
Represented By: Hope Anne Case
Represented By: Adrianna Rubino
Represented By: Jeffrey Alan Snyder Esquire
Represented By: Dylan Bradley Carp Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MAURICE SCIAMMAS, Senior VP of Monolitchic Power Systems, Inc.
Represented By: Hope Anne Case
Represented By: Adrianna Rubino
Represented By: Jeffrey Alan Snyder Esquire
Represented By: Dylan Bradley Carp Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?