Kentrell Welch v. Charles Daniels, et al
| KENTRELL D. WELCH |
| CHARLES DANIELS, STEVE SISOLAK, Terminated per ECF No. 15 Second Amended Complaint, AARON FORD, Terminated #7AC, WILLIAM GITTERE, WILLIAM REUBART, Terminated #7AC, DAVID DRUMMOND, Added per ECF No. 15 Second Amended Complaint, RENEE BAKER, Warden, Terminated #7AC, LORI CARPENTER, Terminated #7AC, ISIDRO BACA, Warden, Terminated #7AC, LISA WALSH, Terminated #7AC, J. HARTMAN, Terminated #7AC, IHAN AZZAM, Modified First Name per ECF No. 15 Second Amended Complaint, CAROLYN GOODMAN, Terminated #7AC, HILARY SCHIEVE, Terminated #7AC, MARILYN KIRKPATRICK, Terminated #7AC, LAWRENCE WEEKLY, Terminated #7AC, LARRY BROWN, Terminated #7AC, JAMES B. GIBSON, Terminated #7AC, JUSTIN JONES, Terminated #7AC, MICHAEL NAFT, Terminated #7AC, TICK SEYERBLOM, Terminated #7AC, P. GIBSON, Terminated #7AC, DEWAYNE DEAL, Terminated #7AC, RHONDA LARSON, Terminated #7AC, C. PETERSON, Terminated #7AC, KATHERINE BRODIE, Terminated #7AC, SHERI QUIGLEY, Terminated #7AC, GEORGE TAGLIATTI, Terminated #7AC, SHERI BRUEGGEMAN, Terminated #7AC, MINDY MCKAY, Terminated #7AC and TASHEENA COOKE, Added per ECF No. 15 Second Amended Complaint |
| 22-16893 |
| December 12, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Kentrell D. Welch response to 1-6-23 order that appeal should go forward. Served on 01/10/2023. [12632149] (BJK) [Entered: 01/17/2023 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: DC): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not move to dismiss this appeal, the court may dismiss the appeal as frivolous, without further notice. Any determination of whether the appeal is frivolous will be based on the opening brief received on December 22, 2022, and appellants statement, if any, in response to this order. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). The opening brief has been filed. Because there are no appearances for appellees, briefing is complete. The Clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. . [12624787] (CKP) [Entered: 01/06/2023 01:16 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Kentrell D. Welch motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/15/2022. [12616683] (BJK) [Entered: 12/22/2022 02:14 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received original and 0 copies of Appellant Kentrell D. Welch opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 12/15/2022. Major deficiency: fees are due. [12616658] (KWG) [Entered: 12/22/2022 01:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kentrell D. Welch opening brief due 02/07/2023. [12608485] (ABT) [Entered: 12/12/2022 03:34 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
