Krystal Lopez v. Dave, Inc.
KRYSTAL LOPEZ |
DAVE, INC. |
22-16915 |
December 14, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Fraud |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 Filed order (SIDNEY R. THOMAS and LUCY H. KOH) The motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]) to stay the district courts November 21, 2022 order pending appeal is denied. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418, 434 (2009). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12684017] (JMR) [Entered: 03/28/2023 04:39 PM] |
Filing 15 Streamlined request [14] by Appellant Dave, Inc. to extend time to file the brief is approved. Streamline requests allow for 30 day extensions. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Dave, Inc. opening brief due 04/24/2023. Appellee Krystal Lopez answering brief due 05/24/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12676762] (DLM) [Entered: 03/17/2023 04:16 PM] |
Filing 14 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Dave, Inc.. New requested due date is 04/21/2023. [12676713] [22-16915] (Totino, Edward) [Entered: 03/17/2023 03:48 PM] |
Filing 13 Filed (ECF) Appellee Krystal Lopez Correspondence: Errata to response to motion to stay lower Court action. Date of service: 03/13/2023. [12673345] [22-16915]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 03/14/2023 by SLM] (Safier, Seth) [Entered: 03/13/2023 07:30 PM] |
Filing 12 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12669473] (CL) [Entered: 03/08/2023 09:14 AM] |
Filing 11 Filed (ECF) Appellant Dave, Inc. reply to response (motion to stay lower court action). Date of service: 03/02/2023. [12666414] [22-16915] (Totino, Edward) [Entered: 03/02/2023 08:21 PM] |
Filing 10 Filed (ECF) Appellee Krystal Lopez response opposing motion ([ # 7 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 7 ] Motion (ECF Filing)). Date of service: 02/28/2023. [12664228] [22-16915] (Safier, Seth) [Entered: 02/28/2023 04:02 PM] |
Filing 9 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AC): The unopposed motion for an extension of time to respond to the motion to stay (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) is granted. The response is due February 28, 2023. [12662582] (AF) [Entered: 02/27/2023 01:45 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Appellee Krystal Lopez Motion to extend time to file opposition until 02/28/2023. Date of service: 02/16/2023. [12654783] [22-16915] (Safier, Seth) [Entered: 02/16/2023 12:26 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Dave, Inc. Motion to stay lower court action. Date of service: 02/08/2023. [12649491] [22-16915] (Totino, Edward) [Entered: 02/08/2023 07:10 PM] |
Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 01/23/2023, 11:00 a.m. PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12622095] (CL) [Entered: 01/03/2023 04:49 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Dave, Inc. Correspondence: Notice that no transcript will be ordered in connection with this appeal. Date of service: 12/30/2022 [12620774] [22-16915] (Totino, Edward) [Entered: 12/30/2022 03:59 PM] |
Filing 4 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/21/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12615735]. [22-16915] (AD) [Entered: 12/21/2022 12:44 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Dave, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/21/2022. [12615631] [22-16915] (Totino, Edward) [Entered: 12/21/2022 11:18 AM] |
Filing 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Dave, Inc. Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/21/2022. Transcript ordered by 01/12/2023. Transcript due 02/13/2023. Appellant Dave, Inc. opening brief due 03/23/2023. Appellee Krystal Lopez answering brief due 04/24/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12610578] (JMR) [Entered: 12/14/2022 01:50 PM] |
Filing 1 Entered appearance of Court Reporter Richard John Duvall in this case. [12610574] (JMR) [Entered: 12/14/2022 01:49 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Krystal Lopez v. Dave, Inc. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff / appellee: KRYSTAL LOPEZ | |
Represented By: | Seth Adam Safier |
Represented By: | Matthew Thomas McCrary |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant / appellant: DAVE, INC. | |
Represented By: | Edward Dean Totino |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.