Jennifer Andrews, et al v. Google LLC, et al
| In re: GOOGLE PLAY STORE SIMULATED CASINO-STYLE GAMES LITIGATION |
| JENNIFER ANDREWS, JOHN SARLEY, MARIA VALENCIA-TORRES, AMANDA KLOTZ, ERICA MONTOYA, EDGAR SMITH, CLINT ENGLEBRETSON, MICHAEL BROWN, JOHN SPARKS, FRANCES LONG, SHELLIE LORDS and TERRI BRUSCHI, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated |
| GOOGLE LLC and GOOGLE PAYMENT CORP. |
| 22-16923 |
| December 15, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Personal Property Damage |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 3, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 01/17/2023, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12621795] [22-16921, 22-16923] (CL) [Entered: 01/03/2023 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellees Jennifer Andrews, Michael Brown, Terri Bruschi, Clint Englebretson, Amanda Klotz, Frances Long, Shellie Lords, Erica Montoya, John Sarley, Edgar Smith, John Sparks and Maria Valencia-Torres in 22-16921, Appellants Jennifer Andrews, Michael Brown, Terri Bruschi, Clint Englebretson, Amanda Klotz, Frances Long, Shellie Lords, Erica Montoya, John Sarley, Edgar Smith, John Sparks and Maria Valencia-Torres in 22-16923 Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/21/2022. [12616136] [22-16921, 22-16923] (Tievsky, Alexander) [Entered: 12/21/2022 07:17 PM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/21/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12616130]. [22-16923] (AD) [Entered: 12/21/2022 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Google LLC and Google Payment Corp. in 22-16921, Appellees Google LLC and Google Payment Corp. in 22-16923 Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/21/2022. [12615814] [22-16921, 22-16923] (Michaud, Teresa) [Entered: 12/21/2022 01:45 PM] |
| Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee in Cross Appeal 22-16923 only, by Plaintiff Appellees-Cross Appellants. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 12/20/2022. [12615268] [22-16923, 22-16921] (RT) [Entered: 12/20/2022 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. Setting cross-appeal briefing schedule as follows: Appellants Jennifer Andrews, Michael Brown, Terri Bruschi, Clint Englebretson, Amanda Klotz, Frances Long, Shellie Lords, Erica Montoya, John Sarley, Edgar Smith, John Sparks and Maria Valencia-Torres Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/22/2022. First cross appeal brief due 03/23/2023 for Google LLC and Google Payment Corp>. Second brief on cross appeal due 04/24/2023 for Jennifer Andrews, Michael Brown, Terri Bruschi, Clint Englebretson, Amanda Klotz, Frances Long, Shellie Lords, Erica Montoya, John Sarley, Edgar Smith, John Sparks and Maria Valencia-Torres. Third brief on cross appeal due 05/24/2023 for Google LLC and Google Payment Corp. Optional cross appeal Reply brief for Jennifer Andrews, Michael Brown, Terri Bruschi, Clint Englebretson, Amanda Klotz, Frances Long, Shellie Lords, Erica Montoya, John Sarley, Edgar Smith, John Sparks and Maria Valencia-Torres is due within 21 days of service of Third brief on cross appeal. [12611635] [22-16923, 22-16921] (RT) [Entered: 12/15/2022 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 1 Filed order (A. WALLACE TASHIMA and SIDNEY R. THOMAS, Circuit Judges) in case no. 22-80098 on December 13, 2022: Respondents motion to withdraw their motion to extend the time to answer the petition and to exceed page limits (Docket Entry No. 6) is granted. The motion to extend time and exceed page limits (Docket Entry No. 4) is withdrawn. The motion for leave to file a reply in support of the petition (Docket Entry No. 8) is granted. The reply has been filed. The petition for permission to appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) is granted. Respondents conditional cross-petition is also granted. See Yamaha Motor Corp., U.S.A. v. Calhoun, 516 U.S. 199, 205 (1996) (holding that under 1292(b), the appellate court may address any issue fairly included within the certified order because it is the order that is appealable, and not the controlling question identified by the district court. (citation omitted)). The Clerk will open cross-appeals. Within 14 days after the date of this order, the parties shall perfect their respective appeals in accordance with Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 5(d). [12611629] (RT) [Entered: 12/15/2022 01:11 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
