Gary Cordery v. Hawaii Supreme Court, et al
| GARY A. CORDERY |
| HAWAII SUPREME COURT, MARK E. RECKTENWALD and HOLLY T. SHIKADA, Esquire, Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Attorney General for the State of Hawaii |
| 22-16970 |
| December 22, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutes - False Claims Act |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| GARY CORDERY V. HAWAII SUPREME COURT, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 14, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Added Attorney(s) Jennifer H. Tran for party(s) Appellee Holly T. Shikada, Appellee Mark E. Recktenwald and Appellee Hawaii Supreme Court, in case 22-16970. [12653234] (QDL) [Entered: 02/14/2023 03:59 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jennifer H. Tran (425 Queen Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813) for Appellees Holly T. Shikada, Esquire, Mark E. Recktenwald and Hawaii Supreme Court. Date of service: 02/14/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12653218] [22-16970] (Tran, Jennifer) [Entered: 02/14/2023 03:54 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12616531] (CKP) [Entered: 12/22/2022 12:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Gary A. Cordery opening brief due 02/17/2023. Appellees Hawaii Supreme Court, Mark E. Recktenwald and Holly T. Shikada, Deputy Assistant Attorney General answering brief due 03/20/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12616328] (JBS) [Entered: 12/22/2022 10:11 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
