Jason Harris v. State of Arizona, et al
| JASON LEE HARRIS |
| STATE OF ARIZONA and MARK BRNOVICH, Attorney General |
| 22-16990 |
| December 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prison Condition |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 25, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and GABRIEL P. SANCHEZ): This court has reviewed the notice of appeal filed December 9, 2022 in the above-referenced district court docket pursuant to the pre-filing review order entered in docket No. 15-80223. Because this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal of the district courts November 21, 2022 order, the appeal will not be permitted to proceed. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); Bishop v. Bechtel Power Corp. (Estate of Bishop), 905 F.2d 1272, 1274-75 (9th Cir. 1990) (order denying motion to remand to state court is not an appealable collateral order). Appeal No. 22-16990 is therefore dismissed. This order, served on the district court for the District of Arizona, will constitute the mandate of this court. No motions for reconsideration, rehearing, clarification, stay of the mandate, or any other submissions will be entertained. DISMISSED. [12638892] (AF) [Entered: 01/25/2023 04:57 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 15-80223. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [12617377] [12617377]--[Edited 12/23/2022 by RT] (RT) [Entered: 12/23/2022 02:15 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
