Jimmie Stephen v. Primm, et al
| JIMMIE STEPHEN |
| PRIMM, Sgt., L. DAVIS, Lt., M. CARSON, Sgt., K. ALLEN, BPH Commissioner, NAY AUNG, Dr., S. GATES, Appeals, T. TAM, PRA, H. FRADE, C.O., RODRIQUEZ, C.O., BERNAL, Attorney, C.O., BARNHART, C.O., G. MATTERSON, Warden, T, TYLER, CDW, A. ESPINOZA, C.O., M. NUNEZ, C.O. and SPECIAL APPEARANCE, on behalf of CDCR |
| 22-16992 |
| December 23, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 1, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Jimmie Stephen Statement arguing imminent danger in support of the in forma pauperis application. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12655270] (HH) [Entered: 02/16/2023 04:25 PM] |
| Filing 4 Received Appellant Jimmie Stephen Copy of motion to rescind motion to dismiss A. Espinoza, filed in district court. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12644907] (HH) [Entered: 02/02/2023 01:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Jimmie Stephen motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 12/26/2022. [12620037] (BJK) [Entered: 12/29/2022 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12618348] (BJK) [Entered: 12/27/2022 01:50 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. This appeal is subject to a pre-filing review order in case number 94-80280. The appeal will be reviewed by the Court to determine whether it will be allowed to proceed. No briefing schedule will be set until/unless the Court determines that the appeal should be allowed to proceed. [12617465] (RT) [Entered: 12/23/2022 04:05 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
