Ortiz Alvarez v. Garland
Petitioner: OSCAR DANIEL ORTIZ ALVAREZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-1705
Filed: October 17, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
April 25, 2024 ORTIZ ALVAREZ V. GARLAND

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 13, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER FILED. The governments unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 24) to submit the case on the briefs is referred for resolution to the panel that will consider the merits of the petition for review. [Entered: 11/13/2023 11:28 AM]
November 9, 2023 Filing 24 MOTION to Submit Case on Briefs Without Oral Argument filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/09/2023 11:56 AM]
November 6, 2023 Filing 23 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Las Vegas. Please review the Las Vegas sitting dates for March 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [22-1705] [Entered: 11/06/2023 04:21 PM]
October 6, 2023 Filing 22 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Phoenix, AZ. Please review the Phoenix sitting dates for February and April 2024 at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [Entered: 10/06/2023 09:31 AM]
September 27, 2023 Filing 21 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 19 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 09/27/2023 11:43 AM]
September 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 19 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 09/20/2023 11:56 AM]
September 20, 2023 Filing 19 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/20/2023 08:52 AM]
September 18, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 17) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due 10/18/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 09/18/2023 02:15 PM]
September 18, 2023 Filing 17 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/18/2023 09:02 AM]
July 24, 2023 Filing 16 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Oscar Daniel Ortiz Alvarez received. [Entered: 07/24/2023 03:07 PM]
July 20, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Oscar Daniel Ortiz Alvarez is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/20/2023 11:32 AM]
July 19, 2023 Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Oscar Daniel Ortiz Alvarez.--[COURT UPDATE: Removed duplicate Addendum] [Entered: 07/19/2023 03:07 PM] [Edited: 07/20/2023 11:23 AM]
April 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 12) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due July 19, 2023. The answering brief is due September 18, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/07/2023 09:45 AM]
April 5, 2023 Filing 12 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Oscar Daniel Ortiz Alvarez. [Entered: 04/05/2023 12:56 PM]
January 6, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 10) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due April 20, 2023. The answering brief is due June 20, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 01/06/2023 09:33 AM]
January 4, 2023 Filing 10 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Oscar Daniel Ortiz Alvarez. [Entered: 01/04/2023 12:23 PM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 10/31/2022 04:26 PM]
October 18, 2022 Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Anthony Cardozo Payne for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/18/2022 11:44 AM]
October 18, 2022 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Abigail Evelyn Leach for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/18/2022 11:41 AM]
October 18, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anthony Cardozo Payne for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/18/2022 07:26 AM]
October 18, 2022 Filing 5 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Abigail Evelyn Leach for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/18/2022 07:24 AM]
October 17, 2022 Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 11/21/2022, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/20/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 3/21/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/17/2022 01:22 PM]
October 17, 2022 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/17/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1705 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/17/2022 01:20 PM]
October 17, 2022 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 9/21/2022. [Entered: 10/17/2022 01:19 PM]
October 17, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/17/2022 01:19 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Ortiz Alvarez v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: OSCAR DANIEL ORTIZ ALVAREZ
Represented By: Mr. Christopher John Stender
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Oil
Represented By: Ms. Abigail Evelyn Leach
Represented By: Mr. Anthony Cardozo Payne
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?