Briciu v. Garland
| ADRIAN DAN BRICIU |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-1724 |
| October 21, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. The court issued orders on January 12, 2023, and March 17, 2023, directing petitioner to file a response explaining why this petition belongs in the Ninth Circuit, and warned that failure to respond could result in the dismissal of the petition. To date, petitioner has not responded. This petition is therefore dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order will be served on the agency and will become the mandate of the court in 21 days. Counsel for petitioner must immediately notify petitioner in writing of this dismissal. [Entered: 04/19/2023 01:56 PM]
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. The court has not received a response to its January 12, 2023, order. If petitioner does not file a response within 21 days of this order, this petition will be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/17/2023 04:28 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. A petition for review must be filed in the court of appeals for the judicial circuit where the immigration judge completed proceedings. See 8 U.S.C. 1252(b)(2). It appears the immigration judge in this case may have completed proceedings in Utah, in the Tenth Circuit. To proceed in this court, petitioner must file a response within 28 days of this order, explaining why this petition belongs in the Ninth Circuit. If petitioner does not respond, the petition will be dismissed or transferred. If petitioner does respond, the government may file a reply within 10 days after service of the response. The briefing schedule is stayed. [Entered: 01/12/2023 04:09 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 12/16/2022 02:33 PM]
|
| Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/16/2022 01:07 PM] |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 11/04/2022 07:39 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Matthew Allan Spurlock for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/21/2022 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Matthew Allan Spurlock for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/21/2022 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 11/25/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 12/16/2022, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/24/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 3/27/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/21/2022 09:49 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 10/21/2022 09:46 AM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/20/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1724 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/21/2022 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 9/20/2022. [Entered: 10/21/2022 09:41 AM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/21/2022 09:41 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Briciu v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ADRIAN DAN BRICIU | |
| Represented By: | Benjamin Cornell |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Matthew Allan Spurlock |
| Represented By: | OIL |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
