Flores Bustos v. Garland
| ANTONIO FLORES BUSTOS |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-1760 |
| October 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 24, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 36 MANDATE ISSUED Michael Daly HAWKINS, Susan P. GRABER, M. Margaret McKEOWN [Entered: 10/24/2023 09:15 AM] |
| Filing 35 MEMORANDUM DISPOSITION (Michael Daly HAWKINS, Susan P. GRABER, M. Margaret McKEOWN) PETITON FOR REVIEW DENIED IN PART, DISMISSED IN PART. FILED AND ENTERED JUDGMENT. [Entered: 09/01/2023 10:30 AM] |
| Filing 34 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED to Michael Daly HAWKINS, Susan P. GRABER, M. Margaret McKEOWN. Audio and video recordings of the argument are available on the courts website at #https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/. [Entered: 08/23/2023 12:27 PM] |
| Filing 33 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Jonathan Aaron Robbins for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/07/2023 06:46 AM] |
| Filing 32 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Jonathan Aaron Robbins [Entered: 08/02/2023 08:48 AM] |
| Filing 31 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jonathan Aaron Robbins for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/02/2023 08:46 AM] |
| Filing 30 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Glenda M. Aldana Madrid for Petitioner Antonio Flores Bustos. [Entered: 07/25/2023 04:18 PM] |
| Filing 29 TEXT ORDER FILED. The motion for judicial notice (DE 15) is DENIED. [Entered: 06/20/2023 03:01 PM] |
| Filing 28 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Wednesday, August 23, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 2 - Scheduled Location: Seattle View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [Entered: 06/12/2023 09:51 AM] |
| Filing 27 NOTICE OF CHANGE IN DETENTION STATUS filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/18/2023 01:43 PM] |
| Filing 26 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Seattle. Please review the Seattle sitting dates for August 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [22-1760] [Entered: 05/11/2023 04:41 PM] |
| Filing 25 Paper copies (6) of Reply Brief submitted at DE 22 by Petitioner Antonio Flores Bustos received. [Entered: 04/26/2023 02:29 PM] |
| Filing 24 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 04/25/2023 12:33 PM] |
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Reply Brief submitted at DE 22 by Petitioner Antonio Flores Bustos is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with gray front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 04/19/2023 04:19 PM]
|
| Filing 22 REPLY BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Antonio Flores Bustos. [Entered: 04/18/2023 11:24 PM] |
|
Filing 21
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 03/28/2023 03:36 PM]
|
| Filing 20 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/28/2023 12:03 PM] |
| Filing 19 REPLY to Response to Motion for Judicial Notice (DE 17) filed by Petitioner Antonio Flores Bustos. [Entered: 03/10/2023 01:42 PM] |
| Filing 18 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Antonio Flores Bustos received. [Entered: 03/07/2023 02:59 PM] |
| Filing 17 RESPONSE to Motion for Judicial Notice (DE 15) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/03/2023 05:44 AM] |
|
Filing 16
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Antonio Flores Bustos is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 03/02/2023 09:41 AM]
|
| Filing 15 MOTION for judicial notice filed by Petitioner Antonio Flores Bustos. [Entered: 03/01/2023 05:49 PM] |
| Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Antonio Flores Bustos. [Entered: 03/01/2023 05:46 PM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 12) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 3/1/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 5/1/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 01/11/2023 11:17 AM]
|
| Filing 12 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Antonio Flores Bustos. [Entered: 01/11/2023 10:14 AM] |
| Filing 11 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 11/10/2022 06:10 AM] |
| Filing 10 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Erik R. Quick for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/31/2022 09:37 AM] |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Erik R. Quick for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/31/2022 05:50 AM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Matt Adams for Petitioner Antonio Flores Bustos. [Entered: 10/28/2022 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Matt Adams for Antonio Flores Bustos. [Entered: 10/28/2022 12:13 PM] |
|
Filing 6
ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 3) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The certified administrative record is due December 1, 2022. The opening brief is due January 30, 2023. The answering brief is due March 31, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 10/28/2022 10:26 AM]
|
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 12/1/2022, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 1/30/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 3/31/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/27/2022 11:49 AM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/27/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1760 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/27/2022 11:47 AM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/27/2022 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 2 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/27/2022 11:46 AM] |
| Filing 1 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 9/30/2022. [Entered: 10/27/2022 11:46 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Flores Bustos v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: ANTONIO FLORES BUSTOS | |
| Represented By: | Matt Adams |
| Represented By: | Glenda M. Aldana Madrid |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Jonathan Aaron Robbins |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Represented By: | Mr. Erik R. Quick |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
