Duarte-Garcia v. Garland
Petitioner: LEONEL DUARTE-GARCIA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-1776
Filed: October 31, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 18, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 18, 2023 Filing 18 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Petitioner Mauricio Jimenez representing Petitioner Leonel Duarte-Garcia. [Entered: 01/18/2023 02:08 PM]
January 18, 2023 Filing 17 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Eliott Nazarian for Petitioner Leonel Duarte-Garcia. [Entered: 01/18/2023 02:06 PM]
January 18, 2023 Filing 16 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Eliott Nazarian for Petitioner Leonel Duarte-Garcia replacing Mauricio Jimenez. [Entered: 01/18/2023 12:12 PM]
December 9, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. The parties joint motion to remand this matter to the Board of Immigration Appeals (Docket Entry No. 14) is granted. Petitioners removal is stayed pending a Board decision in this matter. As stated in the unopposed motion, the parties shall bear their own fees and costs. This order served on the agency shall act as the mandate of this court. REMANDED. [Entered: 12/09/2022 03:03 PM]
November 30, 2022 Filing 14 MOTION to remand case filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/30/2022 10:23 AM]
November 30, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 13 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise.See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 11/30/2022 09:49 AM]
November 30, 2022 Filing 12 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/30/2022 06:49 AM]
November 16, 2022 Filing 11 SUPPLEMENTAL MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Leonel Duarte-Garcia. [COURT ENTERED FILING to correct DE 10.] [Entered: 11/17/2022 11:43 AM]
November 16, 2022 Filing 10 DEFECTIVE --- SUPPLEMENT to Motion to Stay Removal (entry 2) filed by Petitioner Leonel Duarte-Garcia. [Wrong filing type used. Correct entry at DE 11.] [Entered: 11/16/2022 11:50 PM] [Edited: 11/17/2022 11:47 AM]
November 15, 2022 Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 11/15/2022 02:23 AM]
November 2, 2022 Filing 8 Fee Paid by Leonel Duarte-Garcia. Fee Receipt Number: A09-2602531-ACMS. [Entered: 11/02/2022 10:46 AM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Carmel Aileen Morgan for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/31/2022 02:19 PM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Carmel Aileen Morgan for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/31/2022 01:15 PM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 12/5/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 12/27/2022, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/3/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 4/4/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/31/2022 09:09 AM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/29/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1776 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/31/2022 09:07 AM]
October 29, 2022 Filing 3 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 10/6/2022. [Entered: 10/31/2022 09:06 AM]
October 29, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 10/31/2022 09:06 AM]
October 29, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/31/2022 09:06 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Duarte-Garcia v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: LEONEL DUARTE-GARCIA
Represented By: Mr. Eliott Nazarian
Represented By: Mr. Mauricio Jimenez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: OIL
Represented By: Ms. Carmel Aileen Morgan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?