Espinoza-Carranza v. Garland
Petitioner: CARLOS ESPINOZA-CARRANZA
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-1777
Filed: October 31, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
RSS RSS Track this Docket
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on November 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
November 7, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER FILED. Petitioners unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 26) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The court is not inclined to grant further extensions of time to file theopening brief. See July 11, 2023, Announcement at https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/. Any further motion must show extraordinary and compelling circumstances. The opening brief is due January 2, 2024. The answering brief is due March 4, 2024. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief [Entered: 11/07/2023 04:41 PM]
October 31, 2023 Filing 26 MOTION to Extend Time to File Opening Brief filed by Petitioner Carlos Espinoza-Carranza. [Entered: 11/01/2023 07:41 PM]
August 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 24) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted in part. The opening brief is due October 31, 2023. The answering brief is due January 2, 2024. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/04/2023 10:44 AM]
July 27, 2023 Filing 24 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Carlos Espinoza-Carranza. [Entered: 07/28/2023 08:44 AM]
July 27, 2023 Filing 23 NOTICE of change of address filed by Petitioner Carlos Espinoza-Carranza. [Entered: 07/28/2023 08:40 AM]
June 5, 2023 Filing 22 RESPONSE to Mail Returned (DE 21) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/05/2023 08:08 AM]
May 26, 2023 Filing 21 MAIL RETURNED. DE 20 addressed to Petitioner Carlos Espinoza-Carranza. Action taken: governments counsel directed to forward to last known address (see attached notice). [Entered: 05/26/2023 03:51 PM]
May 17, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER FILED. Petitioner's motion (Docket Entry No. 19) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due August 2, 2023. The answering brief is due October 2, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 05/17/2023 04:07 PM]
May 3, 2023 Filing 19 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Carlos Espinoza-Carranza. [Entered: 05/03/2023 02:38 PM]
April 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. Paper Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 17) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due 5/4/2023, Answering Brief Due 7/5/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 04/04/2023 10:30 AM]
April 3, 2023 Filing 17 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Carlos Espinoza-Carranza. [Entered: 04/04/2023 09:55 AM]
January 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER FILED. Richard R. CLIFTON, Gabriel P. SANCHEZ. The renewed motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 15) is granted. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009); Leiva-Perez v. Holder, 640 F.3d 962 (9th Cir. 2011). The stay of removal remains in place until the mandate issues. The briefing schedule remains unchanged. The opening brief is due April 4, 2023. The answering brief is due June 5, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 01/30/2023 06:41 PM]
January 30, 2023 Filing 15 RENEWED MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner Carlos Espinoza-Carranza. [Entered: 01/30/2023 10:27 AM]
January 26, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 14 ORDER FILED. CLIFTON and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges. The court, in its discretion, denies the motion for appointment of pro bono counsel (Docket Entry No. 4). The motion for a stay of removal (Docket Entry No. 2) is denied. See Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009); Leiva-Perez v. Holder, 640 F.3d 962 (9th Cir. 2011). The temporary stay of removal is lifted. If petitioner is removed or otherwise has a change of address, petitioner must notify this court of the new address. Otherwise, the petition may be dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. The opening brief is due April 4, 2023. The answering brief is due June 5, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 01/26/2023 03:54 PM]
December 23, 2022 Filing 13 OPPOSITION to motion to stay removal filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/23/2022 10:45 AM]
December 5, 2022 Filing 12 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Oil-Appellate Oil-Appellate. [Entered: 12/05/2022 11:02 AM]
December 5, 2022 Filing 11 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by Oil-Appellate Oil-Appellate. [Entered: 12/05/2022 11:01 AM]
November 16, 2022 Filing 10 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 11/16/2022 03:56 AM]
November 4, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. Lisa B. Fitzgerald, Appellate Commissioner. The motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. 3) is granted. The Clerk will amend the docket to reflect this status. The certified administrative record remains due December 5, 2022. The response to the motion for a stay of removal remains due December 27, 2022. Briefing is stayed pending resolution of the motion for appointment of counsel. See 9th Cir. R. 27-11. [Entered: 11/04/2022 10:54 AM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Stephanie Leigh Groff for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/31/2022 11:42 AM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Stephanie Leigh Groff for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/31/2022 11:24 AM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 6 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 12/5/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 12/27/2022, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/3/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 4/4/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 10/31/2022 09:15 AM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 5 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/28/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1777 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/31/2022 09:13 AM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 4 MOTION for appointment of counsel filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/31/2022 09:12 AM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION to proceed in forma pauperis filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/31/2022 09:12 AM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 10/31/2022 09:12 AM]
October 31, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/31/2022 09:12 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Espinoza-Carranza v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: CARLOS ESPINOZA-CARRANZA
Represented By: Carlos Espinoza-Carranza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Stephanie Leigh Groff
Represented By: Oil
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?