Singh v. Garland
Petitioner: HARBANS SINGH
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 22-1800
Filed: November 2, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 23, 2024 SINGH V. GARLAND

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 13, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 13, 2023 Filing 28 ARGUED AND SUBMITTED to William A. FLETCHER, Ryan D. NELSON, Daniel P. COLLINS. Audio and video recordings of the argument are available on the courts website at #https://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/media/. [21-859, 22-1800] [Entered: 09/13/2023 11:37 AM]
July 21, 2023 Filing 27 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Christina P. Greer for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [22-1800, 21-859] [Entered: 07/21/2023 05:24 AM]
July 11, 2023 Filing 26 ACKNOWLEDGMENT of hearing notice filed by Nicholas W. Marchi for Petitioner Harbans Singh. [22-1800, 21-859] [Entered: 07/11/2023 09:12 AM]
July 3, 2023 Filing 25 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Wednesday, September 13, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 2 - Scheduled Location: Seattle View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [21-859, 22-1800] [Entered: 07/03/2023 10:25 AM]
July 3, 2023 Filing 24 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Wednesday, September 13, 2023 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 2 - Scheduled Location: Seattle View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you may appear in person at the Courthouse or remotely by video. At this time, even when in person hearings resume, an election to appear remotely by video will not require a motion, and any attorney wishing to appear in person must provide proof of vaccination. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you at least two weeks before the argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for remote appearance. Please note however that if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to file a motion requesting permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [22-1800, 21-859] [Entered: 07/03/2023 10:24 AM]
June 29, 2023 Filing 23 TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Respondent Robert Lundberg representing Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/29/2023 08:25 AM]
June 29, 2023 Filing 22 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Christina P. Greer for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/29/2023 08:24 AM]
June 28, 2023 Filing 21 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Christina P. Greer for Respondent Merrick B. Garland replacing Robert Lundberg. [22-1800, 21-859] [Entered: 06/28/2023 05:35 PM]
May 31, 2023 Filing 20 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Seattle. Please review the Seattle sitting dates for September 2023 and the 2 subsequent sitting months in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. If you have an unavoidable conflict on either of the dates, please file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. When setting your argument date, the court will try to work around unavoidable conflicts; the court is not able to accommodate mere scheduling preferences. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. [21-859, 22-1800] [Entered: 05/31/2023 12:31 PM]
May 11, 2023 Filing 19 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief in No. 22-1800 submitted at DE 43, and DE 17 in No. 21-859 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [21-859, 22-1800] [Entered: 05/11/2023 02:12 PM] [Edited: 05/11/2023 02:26 PM]
May 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 18 ORDER FILED. Answering Brief in No. 22-1800 submitted at DE 17 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [21-859, 22-1800] [Entered: 05/09/2023 02:06 PM]
May 5, 2023 Filing 17 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [22-1800, 21-859] [Entered: 05/05/2023 02:59 PM] [Edited: 06/05/2023 01:26 PM]
April 3, 2023 Filing 16 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief in No. 22-1800 submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Harbans Singh received. [21-859, 22-1800] [Entered: 04/03/2023 04:52 PM]
March 9, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER FILED. Opening Brief in No. 22-1800 submitted at DE 39 by Petitioner Harbans Singh is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [21-859, 22-1800] [Entered: 03/09/2023 12:10 PM]
March 6, 2023 Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Harbans Singh. [21-859, 22-1800] [Entered: 03/06/2023 12:58 PM]
March 6, 2023 Filing 13 DEFECTIVE --- OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Harbans Singh. [22-1800, 21-859]--[duplicate entry, correct entry at DE 14] [Entered: 03/06/2023 12:56 PM] [Edited: 03/07/2023 12:25 PM]
February 8, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Opening Brief for 30 days (DE 37 in No. 21-859; DE 11 in No. 22-1800) granted. Briefing is complete in No. 21-859. Amended briefing schedule in No. 22-1800: Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 3/8/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 5/8/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [21-859, 22-1800] [COURT UPDATE: Edited order docket text.] [Entered: 02/08/2023 10:57 AM] [Edited: 02/08/2023 03:19 PM]
February 6, 2023 Filing 11 STREAMLINED request for extension of time to file opening brief for 30 days filed by Petitioner Harbans Singh. [22-1800, 21-859] [Entered: 02/06/2023 03:11 PM]
December 28, 2022 Filing 10 OPPOSITION to motion to stay removal filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [22-1800, 21-859] [Entered: 12/28/2022 08:49 AM]
November 22, 2022 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER FILED. Nos. 21-859 and 22-1800 are consolidated. The parties must include both case numbers on all future filings. Briefing is complete in No. 21-859. In No. 22-1800, the response to the motion to stay removal remains due December 28, 2022. The opening brief is due February 6, 2023. The answering brief is due April 6, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. Going forward, electronic filers are directed to upload their filings in No. 21-859 and separately upload them in No. 22-1800. [22-1800, 21-859] [Entered: 11/22/2022 04:31 PM]
November 17, 2022 Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Robert Lundberg for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/17/2022 01:27 PM]
November 17, 2022 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Robert Lundberg for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/17/2022 01:10 PM]
November 15, 2022 Filing 6 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 11/15/2022 02:00 PM]
November 2, 2022 Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 12/7/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 12/28/2022, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/6/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 4/6/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/02/2022 03:46 PM]
November 2, 2022 Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 11/2/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1800 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/02/2022 03:44 PM]
November 2, 2022 Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 11/02/2022 03:42 PM]
November 2, 2022 Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 10/11/2022. [Entered: 11/02/2022 03:42 PM]
November 2, 2022 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 11/02/2022 03:42 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Singh v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: HARBANS SINGH
Represented By: Nicholas W. Marchi
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Christina P. Greer
Represented By: Oil
Represented By: Robert Lundberg
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?