Marez-Gallegos v. Garland
| SERGIO MAREZ-GALLEGOS |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-1824 |
| November 4, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 25 NOTICE OF ORAL ARGUMENT on Monday, January 8, 2024 - 09:00 A.M. - Courtroom 3 - Scheduled Location: Pasadena CA View the Oral Argument Calendar for your case #here. NOTE: Although your case is currently scheduled for oral argument, the panel may decide to submit the case on the briefs instead. See Fed. R. App. P. 34. Absent further order of the court, if the court does determine that oral argument is required in this case, you are expected to appear in person at the Courthouse. If an in person appearance would pose a hardship, you must file a motion for permission to appear remotely by video, using ACMS filing type Motion to Appear Remotely for Oral Argument. Such a motion must be filed within 7 days of this notice, absent exigent circumstances. Everyone appearing in person must review and comply with our Protocols for In Person Hearings, available #here. If the panel determines that it will hold oral argument in your case, the Clerk's Office will contact you directly at least two weeks before the set argument date to review any requirements for in person appearance or to make any necessary arrangements for a remote appearance that has been approved or directed by the panel. Please note that if you do file a motion to appear remotely, the court strongly prefers video over telephone appearance. Therefore, if you wish to appear remotely by telephone you will need to justify that request in your motion and receive explicit permission to do so. Be sure to review the #GUIDELINES for important information about your hearing. If you are the specific attorney or self-represented party who will be arguing, use the ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF HEARING NOTICE filing type in ACMS no later than 28 days before the hearing date. No form or other attachment is required. If you will not be arguing, do not file an acknowledgment of hearing notice. [22-1824] [Entered: 10/29/2023 06:17 AM] |
| Filing 24 NOTICE: This case is being considered for an upcoming oral argument calendar in Pasadena. Please review the Pasadena sitting dates for January 2024 and the subsequent sitting month in that location at #http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/court_sessions. Absent an irreconcilable conflict, the court expects you to appear and argue your case during one of these two months. If you have an irreconcilable conflict on any of the dates, please consult with opposing counsel to propose an alternate date and/or location and file Form 32 (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32.pdf) within 3 business days of this notice using the ACMS filing type Response to Case Being Considered for Oral Argument. Please follow the form's instructions (#http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/forms/form32instructions.pdf) carefully. If the parties wish to discuss settlement before an argument date is set, they should jointly request referral to the mediation unit by filing a motion within 3 business days of this notice, using the filing type: Motion to Refer to Mediation. You will receive notice that your case has been assigned to a calendar approximately 10 weeks before the scheduled oral argument date. [22-1824] [Entered: 09/19/2023 11:42 AM] |
| Filing 23 Paper copies (6) of Answering Brief submitted at DE 21 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland received. [Entered: 09/14/2023 01:41 PM] |
Filing 22
ORDER FILED. Answering Brief submitted at DE 21 by Respondent Merrick B. Garland is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Respondent must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with red front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 09/08/2023 04:43 PM]
|
| Filing 21 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 09/07/2023 10:38 AM] |
|
Filing 20
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days (DE 19) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due 10/5/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 08/29/2023 12:21 PM]
|
| Filing 19 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Answering Brief for 30 days filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 08/29/2023 10:31 AM] |
| Filing 18 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Jenny C. Lee [Entered: 07/17/2023 09:34 AM] |
| Filing 17 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jenny C. Lee for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 07/17/2023 08:26 AM] |
| Filing 16 Paper copies (6) of Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Sergio Marez-Gallegos received. [Entered: 07/10/2023 11:35 AM] |
|
Filing 15
ORDER FILED. Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Sergio Marez-Gallegos is filed. Within 7 days of this order, Petitioner must file 6 copies of the brief in paper format bound with blue front cover pages. Each copy must include certification at the end that the copy is identical to the electronic version. The paper copies must be sent to the Clerks principal office. [Entered: 07/05/2023 09:46 AM]
|
| Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Sergio Marez-Gallegos. [Entered: 07/03/2023 01:26 PM] |
|
Filing 13
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 12) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due July 5, 2023. The answering brief is due September 5, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/25/2023 04:16 PM]
|
| Filing 12 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Sergio Marez-Gallegos. [Entered: 04/25/2023 11:08 AM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Petitioner's unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. 10) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due May 5, 2023. The answering brief is due July 5, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 01/27/2023 04:23 PM]
|
| Filing 10 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Sergio Marez-Gallegos. [COURT UPDATE: Attached corrected PDF of motion.] [Entered: 01/24/2023 11:48 AM] [Edited: 01/25/2023 01:46 PM] |
| Filing 9 OPPOSITION to motion to stay removal filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 12/20/2022 07:04 AM] |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 11/17/2022 06:38 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Linda Y. Cheng for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/07/2022 09:09 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Linda Y. Cheng for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 11/07/2022 06:39 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 12/9/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 12/30/2022, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 2/7/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 4/10/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/04/2022 02:15 PM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 11/4/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-1824 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/04/2022 02:13 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 11/04/2022 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 10/26/2022. [Entered: 11/04/2022 02:12 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 11/04/2022 02:12 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Marez-Gallegos v. Garland | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: SERGIO MAREZ-GALLEGOS | |
| Represented By: | Mr. Kyle Jordan Howard, Kyle J. Howard |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL | |
| Represented By: | Jenny C. Lee |
| Represented By: | Linda Y. Cheng |
| Represented By: | Oil |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
